invited Myth
myth or Giovanbattista Vico Giambattista Vico (1668-1744). Neapolitan lawyer was an Italian philosopher of history. Despite his humble origins (the son of a bookseller), he studied law and was professor of rhetoric for over forty years. In his work Principi d'una scienza nuova intorno alla natura delle Nazioni (1744) (known in Castilian as new science principles or new scientific principles. Around the common nature of nations ") in which fundamental principles of sociology as social science. In this work, one of the key points discussed to give an explanation of the social individual action is the MYTH. Vico
examines the fable and myth, which are mental constructs to carry a meaning in the daily coexistence. Are pre-conceptions and prejudices that guide our action in the face of other subjects and shared through such characterizations people understand the world we live and perhaps irrelevant if they do not belong any reference objectivity. At that level what matters is that through these buildings and social life goes platitudes.
few weeks ago Mr. Enrique Krause wrote an article which states that voter fraud is a myth, the logic of writing this article would have us feel that such a thing, there was no fraud, so called myth. Do not go even to the possibility of fraud pit there and think about it or more, to claim the same is sacrilegious in its language as "messianic" would say that it is violating the sacrosanct. His writing is his thinking has its reason, you know that using the myth as a tool to legitimize the myth is possible because you get different readings because the myth is taken as the collective creation of entire villages thereby expressing its historical events , feelings, conceptions ethical and political longings and perplexities, all in a language that logic, given the way of thinking of the time.
Continuing the analysis of myth could say that: The myth and history operate simultaneously in time and space, they represent different cognitive dimensions. As the story aims to compete in the space of reason in the search for causal explanations, for objective reasons, determinants of behaviors, and enrolled in either argumentative logic, myth fixed in the collective consciousness category representations based on exclusion and highly adjectival differentiation rather than argued. Therefore say that fraud is a myth is like using an adjective, then it is not possible to argue.
But this is only one dimension of myth because as we saw at the beginning of this discussion the myths with their structures provide adequately for the construction of images about society, depth and significance levels higher than those of other accounts or those provided by history as an explanation. Its depth is related to the management of partially rooted notions of reason, but mostly on emotion and not conscious levels, while its significance depends on their relationship and their association with the supernatural. In addition to capacity order of thought, the myth contains a manipulable size, can be an ad-hoc speech, according to the interests of the narrator to tell time. It may seem that everyone who believes in the myth is a "mitotero", likes walking in the "mitote" because their actions are not founded on reason. Underlining the manipulable part of the myth in the discourse of different actors, the myth being embedded in social dynamics, which links the interests of social actors and in doing so removes the myth of the logical framework, synchronous. So write that fraud is a myth is not only denial but also adds an adjective to fraud and is out of the question. The other myth is that reading is useful also to distance himself from a political system because that way he is named as part of the pin and "today Mexico and changed." The truth is that in the construction of a collective imagination associated with the exercise of the story is told in a way that justifies and legitimizes one or more positions.
0 comments:
Post a Comment