Gross Profit Templates

rave (runs # gone)

madness
disagrees with my ideas to the point of bitterness, as if they had the capacity to violate the most sacred of their property, not tolerate anyone thinks differently, their thoughts, their perceptions. As in the field of possibilities exist only one. Denying a priori the existence of any other possibility being that the reasoning in the field of ideas, to reach a specific point, there are many roads leading to it. Not all good, not all bad, but all different.
What I try is just expressing what I think is a possibility. Trying to stick as much as possible to the dictates of common sense, using as arguments the specific facts of reality that I live and I live; inferring facts from the sociological point of view as described by Vico. I, a human being, I'm not unlike any other. So I, an actor of my conscious lifetime, I would get up again to present my disagreement about the direction in which things in the country of my birth: Mexico. I do not accept the continued bombing of the "secretary of public education" (Televisa and TV Azteca) in which we do believe that we are the best way possible for social welfare, ignoring the state of social decay in which every time collapses more, the political and social system. But yet the entire effort is to keep up appearances, not to solve the root causes of social breakdown. Hypocrisy is the hallmark of this era. The common good no longer exists with relativism The theory underlying this PAN is, in words that they like to hear a "fig tree" that does not give the promised fruits. Know the story of the barren fig tree!
The economic course is looming, dark, gloomy. The National Intelligence Council of the United States government (SIDA for its acronym in English) in his most resent report how does the future for 2020 says: "The global economy will be significantly larger, but there will be a significant gap between those who and have-nots "
John Gray in his book False Dawn, bolsters the idea that Mexico, along the lines of WB and IMF transits the best way. The main storyline J. Gray, part of the idea developed by Karl Polanyi that the free market is not a natural phenomenon or spontaneous, a natural state that comes when you stop political interference in the trade but, rather, a product of state power, child of a strong centralized government and can not exist without it. A second line of argument has its origins in the thought of Joseph Schumpeter. Against those who condemn state intervention in the economy, Gray argues that, left to itself, capitalism can destroy liberal civilization that produced it. Should, therefore, be tamed to ensure cohesion and social stability. Without significant government intervention, market forces lead to a great social distress. Another
Gray develops arguments is that the identification is usually done between democracy and free markets is wrong. For Gray, one and other are not partners but competitors. As the free market undermines the social institutions and causes great economic insecurity generates a high political resistance. The answer to how to solve this puzzle also gives, but is skeptical, however believes that the only way is to: develop the different capitals according to the different needs and not apply the Washington Consensus "vest."
not appear that Mr. Felipe Calderon understand this right, except those accompanying him on the continued imposition of this model, I think they are willing to continue deepening social decay. The Congress, especially the PRI and PAN showed signs of the same, approved the amendment to the law of ISSSTE. No encienten that social cohesion is based on job security.
In an essay published in the magazine Letras Libres in March 2007, the author Joseph S. Nye writes: "technological change can proceed, but you can not trust politicians alike in government. After all, economic globalization was forced to retreat a century ago by the confluence of war and the rise of communist and fascist ideologies that responded to social inequalities stronger every time. "" With our policies (USA)-regards the author has created more new terrorists than it eliminated ... and as result justifies the loss of civil liberties within the liberal democracies. " If these are not valid arguments, dear reader, you forgive my folly, the product is, in my madness. Job

Cortés O

BY MEXICO JUSTO and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic!

Laura Gemser Stream Vid

madness Literature

disagrees with my delirium
ideas to the point of bitterness, as if they had the capacity to violate the most sacred of their property, not tolerate anyone thinks differently, their thoughts, their perceptions. As in the field of possibilities exist only one. Denying a priori the existence of any other possibility being that the reasoning in the field of ideas, to reach a specific point, there are many roads leading to it. Not all good, not all bad, but all different.
What I try is just expressing what I think is a possibility. Trying to stick as much as possible to the dictates of common sense, using as arguments the specific facts of reality that I live and I live, inferring from the facts sociological point of view as described by Vico. I, a human being, I'm not unlike any other. So I, an actor of my conscious lifetime, I would get up again to present my disagreement about the direction in which things in the country of my birth: Mexico. I do not accept the continued bombing of the "secretary of public education" (Televisa and TV Azteca) in which we do believe that we are the best way possible for social welfare, ignoring the state of social decay in which every time collapses more, the political and social system. But yet the entire effort is to keep up appearances, not to solve the root causes of decay social. Hypocrisy is the hallmark of this era. The common good no longer exists relativism with PAN theory underlying this is, in words that they like to hear a "fig tree" does not give the benefits they promised. Know the story of the barren fig tree!
The economic course is looming, dark, gloomy. The National Intelligence Council of the United States government (SIDA for its acronym in English) in his most resent report how does the future for 2020 says: "The global economy will be significantly larger, but there will be a significant gap between those who and have-nots "John
Gray in his book False Dawn, bolsters the idea that Mexico, along the lines of WB and IMF moves through the best route. The main storyline J. Gray, part of the idea developed by Karl Polanyi that the free market is not a natural phenomenon or spontaneous, a natural state that comes when you stop political interference in the trade but, rather, a product of state power, child of a strong centralized government and can not exist without it. A second line of argument has its origins in the thought of Joseph Schumpeter. Against those who condemn state intervention in the economy, Gray argues that, left to itself, capitalism is able to destroy liberal civilization that produced it. Should, therefore, be tamed to ensure social cohesion and stability. Without significant government intervention, market forces lead to a great social distress. Another
Gray develops arguments is that the identification is usually done between democracy and free markets is wrong. For Gray, one and other are not partners but competitors. As the free market undermines the social institutions and causes great economic insecurity generates a high political resistance. The answer to how to solve this puzzle also gives, but is skeptical, however believes that the only way is to: develop capitalism different according to different needs and not apply to the Washington consensus "vest."
not appear that Mr. Felipe Calderon understand this right, except those accompanying him on the continued imposition of this model, I think they are willing to continue deepening social decay. The Congress, especially the PRI and PAN showed signs of the same, approved the amendment to the law of ISSSTE. No encienten that social cohesion is based on job security.
In an essay published in the magazine Letras Libres in March 2007, the author Joseph S. Nye writes: "technological change can proceed, but can not be trusted equally government politicians. After all, economic globalization was forced to retreat a century ago by the confluence of war and the rise of communist and fascist ideologies that responded to social inequalities stronger every time. "" With our policies (USA)-regards this author - you have created more new terrorists than it eliminated ... and as a result justifies the loss of civil liberties within the liberal democracies. " If these are not valid arguments, dear reader, you forgive my folly, the product is, in my madness. Job

Cortés O

BY MEXICO JUSTO and without rancor, MEXICO NO ONE Liberal and Conservative? Fundemos The Fourth Republic! STORY

Wil Aeron Chair Fit In Car?

Some


Eraclio Zepeda (Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas, 1937) prefers the office of "storyteller solidarity", which is dedicated to recreating the oral narratives that increasingly pronounced, that of "lone writer", which recreates in word these same stories written for killing and posterity. Laco, as his friends call him, he prefers to talk than to write, true to the tradition of oral story tellers of Chiapas, whose office, respected and admired throughout the region, he learned as a child.
In 2004 we celebrated the "Week of Eraclio Zepeda at Casa de America" oral narratives, in Madrid, Spain. Eraclio Zepeda
apprehends the world around him and to mix with their experiences, builds and literary form to his words, which retain a spirit filled with humor and surprise with his job played a storyteller, but above all, the noble art of storyteller: "I believe that man will never cease to wonder. And when it does, it will be so boring the office of man, who will have to look for other things. Certainly come a revolution. "
"- Are you going to fly, Don Chico?
-Secure, said.
- And ... go far, Don Chico?
-very far.
- What height, Don Chico?
-High.
- When you reach heaven, Don Chico?
-the very sky.
's face lit up asking him: "For his lifetime
Don Chico, bring to heaven the cheese to my mother who died with the craving."






THE BEAT POETRY
Suddenly

One day

death suddenly falls



Dreams Sidewalks

The bed plans
mutilated
And fear without meaning Paralyzed

waiting Delving eating into the vitals

Living Waiting half strike
STREET





In this street all the houses in
always someone ... agonizing

Only a few realize.

After leaving school
Young

happily walk down that street and go

Unbeknownst
all households face always Where

Someone named

Unknown to them dying. Job



Cortés O

MEXICO FOR A FAIR and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic!

Memory On Wedding Program

The idea of \u200b\u200bchange (update)

The idea of \u200b\u200bchange

The idea of \u200b\u200ba new change, is that form that has taken Ethics of irresponsibility. Because there is also the ethic of responsibility. Ethics literally translates to character and character is formed habits, and habits are formed through repetition in a disciplined and consistent for the space of time well established that in the end this activity difficult, less practice with the effort and greater productivity. So the habit is a tool for character development. Therefore our politicians and have certain habits that have given his character, his ethics, which we know the results. In these dire results blame politicians, but accountable a society without ethics of the family as a whole family feat to citizens and therefore political.

The idea of \u200b\u200b"new" start, the "new" principle is always incoherent to deny the former government, but this will do the same, but while thus legitimized in the collective imagination.

Today as before, now we are told that if you start a new Mexico. 100 days ago was another Mexico, which follows, no longer exists, refuses the past that happens and that this statement disclaims any commitment, political ethics: responsibility. Every principle

always full of hope. Understanding this principle can also be good or bad, and hope may be favorable or unfavorable, and still be hope. So use this idea of \u200b\u200ba new beginning, which do not specify either well, that kind of principle is, that could be interpreted as the beginning of the end or the beginning of the beginning or the beginning of immobility. In summary, these strategists fresh start should not forget that there are beginning to come good or ill to come early.


The principle is the first part of the road, remembering that the road does not necessarily have to be new. It can be a path already traveled many times, and this "new" listing Start is a story already written, before a road trip. So they want a new beginning as we understand it in our collective imagination: THERE. We just have to remember that to continue with the same economic and political model, things really will not change because the NIC Report 2020, provides that globalization is irreversible, but that's not the problem. It also provides that "the global economy will be significantly larger, but there will be a significant gap between those with and those without."

advertising strategies employed to give the impression to our psyche, of what it is today of real change even if a contradiction, that previously we were told that "today Mexico and change." But it seems that this contradiction is the least important by the heavy cavalry of the marketing does not give you time to think about the collective psyche.

The earlier start and earlier before, they were beginning, there were early, was more of the same. So today just to get the champions of freedom and we announced new freedoms without first meeting and have been carrying out these freedoms that previously was "subdued."

The idea of \u200b\u200b"new" home, and I say "again" because there are already other beginning our history, those that are repeated every 6 years for many years. Thus be planted in our imagination the imagination of the idea of \u200b\u200bchange, without change, but the imagination does not provide us with this reality, but something else. But these "new politicians" should not forget that "imagination is all right ... minus one really supplant, replace, hide, pretend to be real and pretend that what we believe"


2007-03 March 22 Job

-22
Cortés O

MEXICO JUST ONE and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic!

Secret Of Indian Big Boobs

The idea of \u200b\u200bchange PEMEX

The idea of \u200b\u200bchange

The idea a new change, is that form that has taken the ethics of irresponsibility. Because there is also the ethic of responsibility. Ethics literally translates to character and character is formed habits, and habits are formed through repetition in a disciplined and consistent for the space of time well established that in the end this activity difficult, less practice with the effort and greater productivity. So the habit is a tool for character development. Therefore our politicians and have certain habits that have given his character, his ethics, which we know the results. Blame for these dismal results politicians, but accountable to society, that without the ethics of the family as a whole family feat to citizens and therefore political.

The idea of \u200b\u200b"new" start, the "new" principle is always incoherent to deny the former government, but this will do the same, but while thus legitimized in the collective imagination.

Today as before, now we are told that if you start a new Mexico. 100 days ago was another Mexico, which follows, no longer exists, refuses the past that happens and that this statement disclaims any commitment, political ethics: the responsibility.

Every beginning is always full of hope. Understanding this principle can also be good or bad, and hope may be favorable or unfavorable, and still be hope. So use this idea of \u200b\u200ba new beginning, which do not specify either well, that kind of principle is, that could be interpreted as the beginning of the end or the beginning of the beginning or the beginning of immobility. In summary, these strategists fresh start should not forget that there are beginning to come good or ill to come early.


The principle is the first part of the road, remembering that the road does not necessarily have to be new. It can be a path already traveled many times; and this "new" notice of commencement is a story already written, before a road trip. So they want a new beginning as we understand it in our collective imagination there.

advertising strategies employed to give the impression to our psyche, of what it is today, but real change is a contradiction, because previously we were told that "today Mexico and change." But it seems that this contradiction is the least important by the heavy cavalry of the marketing does not give you time to think about the collective psyche.

The earlier start and earlier before, they were beginning, there were early, was more same. So today just to get the champions of freedom and we announced new freedoms without first meeting and have been carrying out these freedoms that previously was "subdued."

The idea of \u200b\u200b"new" home, and I say "again" because there are already other beginning our history, those that are repeated every 6 years, for many years. Thus be planted in our imagination the imagination of the idea of \u200b\u200bchange, without change, but the imagination does not provide us with this reality, but something else. But these "new politicians" should not forget that "imagination is all right ... but one; supplant reality replace, hide, pretend to be real and pretend that what we believe "


March 22

03/22/2007 O Cortez Job

MEXICO FOR A FAIR and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES ,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic!

How To Beat The Levelin Supertux

Dismantle

"Dismantled PEMEX" Julio Pomar



- I want your views on how you see now the nation's energy industry, and if your situation somehow justify privatization ...

- This sector since 1982 is under a real attack by internal and external sectors. These are large oligopolistic firms or sectors external and internal partners that our energy sector undergoes a process of dismantling insistent. Very particular strategy has been handled, from the so-called international financial institutions like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund for such purposes.

For example, the division of PEMEX in four different companies, and made to compete with each other, including relationship difficulties, price, etc.. Is almost unheard of in the global oil industry. No industry or international oil company has operated successfully without an adequate and strong vertical integration of all activities, ranging from the well to petrochemical production various aspects chain. So that was very clear that the idea of \u200b\u200bdividing into four companies PEMEX, sponsored by the World Bank, a policy which was accepted very uncritically, very clumsily, by the de facto government of Salinas de Gortari, has generated an enormous vulnerability and a large inefficiencies, and that posts high, ranging from media management levels up, have more than quintupled without that was expressed in greater efficiency and higher production of the company. But the intention was not the company more efficient, as it was posed, but to prepare for decommissioning.

- They have become inefficient, contrary to what supporters say privatization ...

- Yes, absolutely. We have a number of indicators of how a company that sells supplies and PEMEX-production, not associated directly with Pemex-Petrochemicals and Refining, and then Pemex-Petrochemicals and Refining have to get out somewhere else, because they leave cheaper than buying them from another part of the company. This is crazy, absolutely no international company does that, the trend in all the major companies is precisaente accelerate, strengthen vertical integration, which is making them more efficient, but that's not what was on the minds of those who sponsored this division. The other measure

clumsy, a of the most serious action, occurred also in the mid 80's, and this was the chronic underfunding and systematic oil processing activity. In this regard we have the data from the same company, PEMEX we mean that it produced 20 million tons of petrochemicals and petroleum products, and currently only produces 6 million per year. That is, have done the opposite of what is done internationally and what any company, especially a public company in the Third World to do, which is the transformation, industrialization of a resource as fundamental as oil, with therefore added value, not an insert colonial cutting in the country specializing in exporting crude oil.

- How can this be seen in the context of the "divestiture" of state authorities?

We have another huge anomaly, which is not presented in any other major oil producer. We could say that Mexico is unique in the world, a country with these dimensions, no longer controls its steel, is unique in the world that no longer has a national banking system, and is a major global unique case producer and exporter of oil is more important, that spends more on imported refined products and petrol, natural gas, the value of exports oil. And that is defined as a major anomaly, is one of the most serious manifestations of the adoption of a colonial court scheme, which is a major regression, because from 1938, despite the sabotage of large enterprises that had concerned, and for the 60 and 70 this developed a real feat of petroleum engineering and technology development.

Well, and bad in the country, it has been almost reversed. Both in the field of petrochemicals and in the closely related with it, oil technology. The dismantling of the Mexican Petroleum Institute is really deplorable and what they have done is to transform the IMP generator technology center important to the national petrochemical plant, a kind of graduate schoolhouse. So I would say that would be another important element.

- Who implements these changes in government?

- Yes, this comes as part of the requirements of the country's creditors, articulated by the World Bank and implemented through the Ministry of Finance International Monetary Fund. I'm not saying this so to speak. I refer to statements made by Raul Munoz Leos, the first director of PEMEX during the administration of Fox, who has confessed to the Energy Department actually has nothing to do with the direction of the energy sector but that's what defines who manage budgets, which are the masters of Finance and precisely this secretariat has been the most subject to IMF guidelines. In such a way that's one of the main problems we have.

- What is what is proposed by the creditors of Mexico?

is the requirement for creditors is to open the entrance to the large monopoly or oligopoly its energy sector in the world. In a context in which the Mexican state agency has been subject to administrative dismemberment, which puts it in an extremely vulnerable in the face of big business, that contrary to what was done here, have strengthened their integration into both horizontal or vertical level.

- Petroleos Mexicanos has viablilidad and production and financial strength to succeed?

- Sure, there is another central point. Is that despite all this process very negative contrasts with what is done internationally, growing companies has undergone a veritable assault prosecutor. PEMEX has been paying between 87 and 106% of their profits to the treasury. If that compared with British Petroleum, which pays a rate of 30 percent, will note the degree of fiscal assault here. No company in the world endure harassment fiscal, fiscal sabotage of this size. And PEMEX is a company that has responded to the order of viability, which has endured, but of course, for example, to give one instance, for the year 2004 the company generated U.S. $ 42 billion net, but the Treasury tax imposed by 44 thousand, two thousand million dollars. In this way the company is forced to borrow to pay the IRS. That is, the Mexican government, under the hegemony of a predatory oligarchy and international interests, brutal assaults and irrational way to the company that makes the greatest contribution to funciionamiento government tax. PEMEX pays more taxes than all private meetings, and there's more: PEMEX revenues have allowed the government to have a lax attitude regarding what is a true tax reform that should be promoted, and that is that those with higher incomes pay more. Throughout the period of stabilizing development, which we can put práctricamente from the 60's and 70 to 80, the state always took care of business, besides being the largest taxpayer, to receive sufficient revenues by itself for maintenance and expansion.

- When is this policy?

- it's all gone with the so-called neoliberalism. It ended when the creditors imposed a regime at any cost, we call neoliberalism, but is specified in the conditions imposed by the WB and the IMF, for the serious blunder in the negotiation of the debt crisis made in the government of Miguel de la Madrid, the secretary of Haciernda, Silva Herzog Flores. This is not a product of globalization, in quotes, this is the result of a bad bargain, or a non-negotiation. U.S. negotiator of the Mexican debt, John Bailey, in times of Ronald Reagan, when here was in the power of the mother, was interviewed ten years later by Dolia Estevez, who asked what was the nature of the negotiations that will attention. Bayley said: "The thing that struck me was that the Mexican team, instead of negotiating for the position of a country debtor, was placed on the side of banks and creditors "and accepted the terms because it implied that only cash was a problem, not a crisis, not a major structural problem. And asked: "And if you were in the Mexican negotiating team, what would you do?". Replied: "I have met with major Latin American debtors and the banks would have faced had told them: if you do not change the parameters of the negotiations we go to a moratorium." Well, that was precisely what he was proposing the nationalist sector of Mexico and that was precisely what the great American negotiator was proposing.

- What was, therefore, the impact of these negotiations in the oil?

- have favored a debt service above all, put into question all the oil revenue and they began to accept these conditions and so enormous country brutally diverts public investment resources towards non-productive expenditures, as it was and the heavy debt service, generating huge budget gaps that were filled with loans. But these are not made by philanthropic institutions, but for-profit institutions like the World Bank, which articulates the interests of the business class of their countries. Then placed a number of constraints to open spaces for their businesses, and a fundamental part of the design was the dismantling or opening Mexican parastatal sector, which allowed large foreign monopolies into the country. And the more weight that sector, the petro-electric sector, which has resisted a lot but has been subjected to de facto privatization processes, which are more stressed from 82.

- And the electricity, how goes?

- two sectors - oil and electricity - are fully related by the fact that 80% of the electricity generated in plants driven by oil. So what we have now is the entry of these large consortia in the electricity sector. Iberdrola is already here and have a very large number of foreign companies in, for a number of changes to laws. The Salinas lawyer specialized in brutally attacking the country, was a usurper who needed legitimacy and legitimized on the basis of a very particular appeasement, which I discussed in my book for sale in Mexico, "with the attitude of another distinguished submissive as bad Santana.

- But in the oil sector have the multiple service contracts. With this scheme accelerated the dismantling of the company operating. For example, major general of PEMEX addresses begin to look like shells, but is retired and says goodbye technicians in layoffs ant workers to instead, signing contracts with international suppliers of certain services, such as with companies closely linked with the U.S. government, as Hallyburton, such as Bechtel, which are companies which, together with other contractors have taken over the country's main oilfield, the second largest in the world, which is that of Cantarell, and the management have done is based on immediate interests and security and business the U.S.. These interests are as a result accelerate the export of Mexican oil, for which the giant Cantarell field has been injected nitrogen into the reservoir, which according with international technical, is the worst that could be adopted, it serves to make the most in the shortest time, but it ruins the oil field. They have not paid attention to technical proposals as Garaicochea Francisco engineer who has made a very large number of studies on this, suggesting of course the re-injection of associated gas at Cantarell, which we would have saved between 4 thousand or 4 000 500 million dollars. I think we should pay much attention to what these engineers are telling us.

- This can be attributed to globalization?

- No, this is due to a submission, not globalization, but the referral an economic and political leadership of the country and the government leadership and the interests articulated by the White House Halliburton. Since Fox came to government in February 2001 to May 2005, had given contracts Hallyburton per thousand 222 million dollars. It is not anything, I am referring to only one company, which is linked to Mr Cheney. Besides the loss of business for the country, besides the desmantelmiasento and put aside the national oil industry, which cost much to develop as well as the technicians who took so trained, and workers much-needed employment, in addition to all that is the safety factor, because the eyes and ears gets companies intimamenmte articulated from the security apparatus of the EU, as Hallyburton, which handles information anywhere in the world is highly sensitive, as is the amount of oil are the oil fields.

Thus besides being a huge blunder - and I'm being very generous in terms, did not use the word treason, or corruption, although the terms to be used - the huge blunder of putting them foreign companies in the technical management of PEMEX, you already got us into the kitchen.

This implies that if I want to have data which is what is happening in our oil industry, I have to go to Houston to wonder foreign consultants because they have better data than we are. But do not forget that national security is data in a world where conventional oil is increasingly difficult to achieve, in which the oil discovery rate has virtually collapsed, in this world that we have a war the first and second oil reserves in the world. The first is in Saudi Arabia, the second largest producer is Iraq, and Iran continues, which is already in sight, in a world that is happening, which militarized international economic relations in our trading partner free comerdio preaches but does not believe in market mechanisms to gain access to oil from others, or believe in the invisible hand of the market, but in the hard fist of the Pentagon. The U.S. security elite does not have much confidence in market mechanisms, so much so use state instruments, and instruments may have been more powerful than the Pentagon or the CIA. In this world there is an enormous blunder committed this crime against the country that has been giving systematically with increasing depth, from 82 to date, although I fear that if I go and review the six years in which he acted Diaz Serrano (with López Portillo) encntraría serious problems for the close relationship this man with Zapata Drilling Co., which was a company run by George Bush Sr., who had served as CIA director.

- The picture, then, is disappointing for Mexico

- I would say that the picture we have is extremely dangerous for the future, as the systematic disinvestment in the maintenance, expansion in exploration and drilling for PEMEX and in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Commission of the United States has made the reserve figures have collapsed, as well as exploitation.

That does not infer that the country has no oil resources. The country has with them, possibly in shallow water is a good deal, and also deep water and on the same platform enough, but this requires investment, drilling, and to incorporate billion barrels of proven reserve concept is needs precisely that investment has not been done. Consequently, in order to 2012-2014 are facing an extremely difficult, in a context of extreme vulnerability and the importance of oil to the functioning of the global economy and national.

As the electricity sector, this is highly oiling, so that the potential oil shortage can be devastating. In addition, the system of passenger and cargo of the country depends on oil percentage as high as the U.S., at 95-97 percent.

- Have we made progress in developing alternative energy sources?

- not seriously thought about what is going to be done over the next 10 to 20 years to arrive at a definition of the country's energy cocktail. Not because the country has no other renewable resources. Mexico is a solar country has enough solar capacity to generate a large amount of energy. It also has identified geographical areas and where possible, but has not yet been measured, but is substantial wind power, plus we have hydro and other options that are not environmentally harmful.

I certainly am not in favor of advancing the core-electricity because environmental costs can be catastrophic, as happened in the U.S., in Three Miles Island and Chernobyl, but there are renewable sources.

believe that if Mexico had continued with the industrialization of oil, with the expansion of the refinery plant as one of the cornerstones of accumulation, the standard of living in the country today would be similar to having the average Italian. That's what we have lost in these years of free market quotation marks, and neoliberalism.

- What is what awaits the national energy sector?

- The situation is not gray situation, but that dark at the moment. The country continues on this course. The current Lords ruling power are doing business. We just saw the shameful business of steel, the country and ran out of steel, that is, without the instruments of scientific and technological universities are being underfunded. The most unfortunate situation I see for the moment and we need not finish dismantling the oil company.

In sum, the World Bank's central idea, explicit in a book I did with Gian Delgado "Economic imperialism in Mexico", with documents and facts themselves are left to PEMEX as a shell, as a mere object of manipulation of public opinion, but all that is substantive business continue to dismantle.

And Calderon will follow the same line. I see there are gentlemen inside and outside who are very interested. Moreover, when we talk about national security, if not put the defense as a central point of petroleum wealth and their income, then you know that means national security.

MEXICO JUST ONE and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republica!

How To Fix Cursor In Laptop

Alejandro Encinas RODRRIGUEZ

"Perception is reality" Alejandro Encinas Rodríguez

March 14, 2007
THE UNIVERSAL

In November last year, I had a meeting with one of the closest business to Mr. Felipe Calderon. In it, beyond matters related to their activity in the Federal District, I berated the actions taken by Andrés Manuel López Obrador and the coalition For the Good of All, after the elections of July 2, in particular, the installation of the encampment in the Paseo de la Reforma.

With this decision, he noted, López Obrador wronged and took the city a radical, who not only would drop their preferences, but alienate the different social sectors in which it had cultivated sympathies and identify internal divisions in his party, more discredited and marginalized. Hence it was easy to portray him as an uncompromising politician, acting outside the framework of law and institutions, does not assume the results of a legal process that is conducted on a whim. Rounded


his criticism in one sentence: "perception is reality", and climb up that image will be very difficult.


this investor's view was not, but the advance of a communication strategy whose purpose beyond creating an information blockade around López Obrador and the Democratic National Convention, is to virtually eliminate the political imagination of the media field any manifestation of opposition polo clearer in the country.


This is not a novel practice. Since the times of the PRI have been numerous campaigns that seek to discredit the opponent. Just remember the smear campaign they suffered in 1968 the Mexican students who were associated with an international plot, or those that emerged in 1988 against members of the Democratic Current of the PRI, after his break with the ruling party; or engineer the coup against Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas, after the execution of Stanley and conductor Francisco recently, the dirty war in the electoral process had to Lopez Obrador "a danger to Mexico."


However, the political landscape of our country is different from previous years and the balance that has left the electoral process far exceeds the political-partisan confrontation, creating a deep social polarization that nested like never before more negative feelings of our society: discrimination, social and racial contempt, which has realized a segmented and unequal society.


What the country facing today, more than a post-electoral conflict is a confrontation of classes and this can not be overcome by effective media management. Heal the wounds resulting from this confrontation is not easy and assume that the exclusion or disregard for the opponent is going to solve it merely reflects political myopia.


The strategy has been implemented on time, the activities of Lopez Obrador and the Democratic National Convention have been, with few exceptions, removed from the media, especially television news reports of duopoly, in which according to monitoring various notes recorded negative impact, which for example, any internal debate, whether the definition of an application or evaluation of the electoral process, it registers as a sign of division and loss of leadership. However


presents a phenomenon, the decline was not as severe as expected and instead there is a loss of credibility of the information media and even a sector of the population has chosen to move away from television news migrating to other media.


At the time, the underlying problem, the social polarization, the bitterness of class, unequal society, is there, and no media campaign can hide, so required, rather than effective speech or threats of hardening, it is understood that a basic condition for good governance of this country is making a real transformation of national institutions show signs of exhaustion and recognize the political weight of the left overcome this crisis.


aencinas@economia.unam.mx


Professor, Faculty of Economics, UNAM MEXICO JUST ONE

and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic!

How Do I Remove Shoe Polish From My Window?

the Memories of the fourth republic


resents the Fourth Republic in his column mind Lorenzo Meyer COLMEX writer and researcher makes the following question "How Mexico now live in a democracy and what kind? It is not possible to give a clear and objective, it responds. However, as the issue is key, there are at least to try to clarify it. "
And you try with the arguments of one of the most recognized Latin American theorists, Professor Guillermo O'Donnell, who relates that" has never been anything that can be called a completely fair election "because even in the best candidates are featuring some unfair advantages. However, what matters is not the problem itself, for no real democracy free from defects, but how serious it is. In a advanced democracies number of problems do not prevent acceptable performance of the system but in other less strong, yes.

To determine the nature of evil is necessary to first determine the essence of this concept, it lacks a clear, universally accepted. It is a notion that has always been a debate and, moreover, is protein, ie change its own development, since the transformer is in their nature. For these reasons it is possible to have the style of those who study the physical phenomena of an objective means of verification that allows itself to decide what and what is not true democracy. Worldwide
real what can and should make every society, says O'Donnell, is seeking to reach and stay within that segment of countries where the system works acceptably and dominates the "critical citizen." However, most of Latin America and a number of countries in Eastern Europe are in a second group where the quality of the political settlement is lower and where, therefore, commands a kind of "skeptical citizen" who does not trust in the institutional arrangement within which lives and has a low opinion of their parties, legislators and judges. Finally there is a third type of systems ("the third world democracy?) Where this form of government and political competition is only shell without content. In these "electoral authoritarian" work only subjects, not citizens. "
For Argentine theoretical, historical processes show that at the end are two basic components of a modern democracy, including low quality. On the one hand, that the opposition has a reasonable chance of actually winning, and also that political freedoms do not only give the opportunity to speak and associate it to access information that is not monopolized. In contrast, the "electoral authoritarianism", there may be parties and even a formal competition, but that power is subject to a rule that entirely undermines the notion of this form of government "under no circumstances be allowed to beat the opposition" freedoms are restricted and controlled information.
After hearing the negative as in fair which brought the 2006 elections, as well as censorship by the government in the case of Oaxaca, the brutal repression is not widespread, a legitimate citizen movement can not be talking about democracy. In Mexico I have said before we live the double standard of the masks. Lorenzo Meyler is clear reiterates: "As in 1929, 1940, 1946, 1952 or 1988, in 2006 the opposition could compete but not win."

Lorenzo Meyer, ends his article wondering if Mexico is experiencing a low-quality democracy or electoral authoritarianism. I particularly in view of events, I strongly believe that Mexico is in electoral authoritarianism, where only the votes of the electors, who are the big cities and those in power, the rest of us mere stooge of the system, that have no problem to win the PRI or the PAN, is a stooge of the other. The TV we form our opinion based on their convenience, in the meantime, all we do is complain about our personal misfortunes is the right place to affect the decisions of a few. You think, dear reader, this is in favor of the PRD, in any way This form is for free citizens, and therefore critical actors of his time. Job
Cortés

MEXICO JUST ONE

and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic!

Free Online Toybox Plans

Thursday August 3, 2006

Gustavo Iruegas

megafraud vs megaplantón
Occupation of Paseo de la Reforma is much more than a nuisance for motorists who often use our most elegant way. It is a test of strength. Put more colloquially, it is playing a matured between the oligarchy, a small and powerful and the poor people, large and strong. Very strong.

This situation has come through a gradual process of abuse and contempt of law and democracy by the factual and class-based coalition government, party, money and media. Trials failed to false compensation billionaires landowners rode the infamous impeachment process, smear campaigns were launched and supported lying illegally from the executive and business sectors, was used to defectors from the PRI electoral experts tricky operations, an attempt was distort accounts of the boxes and districts, and the apparatus was used to induce a result IFE altered the account of the vote. Each of these attempts was dismantled and defeated with the formidable weapon of mass mobilization.

Now the matter has reached the final steps of due process. The electoral court can not simply punish the statement by the IFE, as might have been if the institution had acted with efficiency and transparency; now must address the serious national problem that is of doubtful results of the accounts and certainty that society is divided into two irreconcilable and that, according to the precepts of democracy, one should accept being ruled by another.

That is the serious problem that touches address the court. Its members necessarily feel the enormous pressure of historical responsibility. But beyond that, the court is not depressible. Not popular mobilization or by personal representation or blackmail or threats. Neither the status of judges and their associated integration permit.

Thus, popular mobilization is aimed at forcing a decision of the board members that they would not otherwise, but to show that the magnitude of the move is necessary and inevitable that the verdict is sustained in absolute transparency, general and unquestioned scrutiny. Therein lies the governance of Mexico. Governance not only negotiable majorities in Congress, but governance in its profound meaning of social peace.

Esta comprometida situación no parece haberse comprendido y la presencia popular en la calle se asume como una insolencia que ha desbordado la irritación y la imaginación de los dueños de los medios informativos comerciales y de sus personeros, a su vez movilizados para escandalizar a nuestra encantadora y pequeña burguesía porque ha sido invadido su Paseo.

Piensan que el mismo alegato con que azuzan a la parte cursilona de la clase media sirve para indignar a los que se mueven en el Metro o en los peligrosos microbuses; niegan el derecho a sentarse en ese pavimento a los desempleados y a los que solamente admiten ahí si limpian sus parabrisas o venden al por menor productos chinos contrabandeados al por mayor por los large retailers. But even remotely considered getting out of their cars, or venture into the slums, or ride the Metro or bus. That's not for them.

forget that a few weeks ago was the fifth time (68, 85, 88, 2005 and the campaigns of 2006) that the people of Mexico surpassed the propaganda campaign used to mediate their opinion and attitude towards the abuse of power . The people can not, yet, silence hysterical campaigns on radio, television and newspapers, but I can not hear. Now is heard. And take the Paseo de la Reforma.

thinking The middle class has been called renegade, and sometimes it is not of its kind, but of their commitment. It would be understandable dissatisfaction with the occupation of the Paseo de la Reforma if it were an isolated and willful, but is not the case. It is a response to aggression infinitely more serious and important, which is made on the popular will and which permitted, would result in the cancellation of democracy and the disruption of our society.

perceived only two circumstances that would lead to unemployment of the Paseo de la Reforma, that the dispute has been settled fully and legally, or that the street takes to be replaced by higher forms of popular resistance.

Forward, comrades. BY

MEXICO JUST AN and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic!

How To Make Nose Capillaries Disappear

future Gustavo Iruegas

The News Today JornadaDiario Subscriptions Archive Contact

You are here: Edit the February 16, 2007 → Review → One step forward Gustavo Iruegas


A
Every step forward on February 9 the Army recalls the progress of the Heroic Military College cadets accompanying President Francisco I. Madero Chapultepec Castle on the National Palace, where warlords resist in arms against their government democratically elected. The bizarre act did not prevent the subsequent murder of president. That was not the only case in which the loyalty of the Military College President has manifested itself in the facts. The heroic squad also accompanied President Carranza when, betrayed by the generals of the army major conspirators in the Plan of Agua Prieta, began their painful march to Vera Cruz besieged by rebel troops. Having been released to stay in Mexico City, but told to take a step forward if they were willing to follow and protect the president, members of the Cavalry School Military College chose loyalty. A few days later, in Apizaco, the proximity of the enemy and not allow otherwise, was determined to launch a furious charge by the cavalry saber-perhaps the last in our history "of the cadets on the hosts Obregon, who were forced to turn back and flee in a hurry. Again treason was consummated with the assassination of President Carranza.

These two samples of allegiance was made by the Cadets against the treachery of the generals, which can be seen that the ritual is directed more to the military to civilians. With the consolidation of the revolutionary governments military loyalty to the civilian president became an Army doctrinal element accommodating especially the second of his missions, which is to ensure Internally, a concept that encompasses both social peace as the regime's legitimacy. That attitude, doctrine and practice-differentiated to Mexico in the second half of the twentieth century the rest of Latin America, where the armies were ready to the coup and the establishment of military dictatorships in the name of democracy.

Now things have changed. In Latin America, as a result of economic failure, political, social and moral development of neoliberalism, unquestionably increase the democratic and progressive governments to give their commitment to social programs and national perspective. Mexico, in a regressive movement towards its own history, has been placed on the extreme right the Latin American region and has been unthinkably here, here, where there was a coup: an operation designed to preserve the established power and breach of constitutional provisions, carried out by organs of the State with the participation or tolerance of strength machines, designed to impose a de facto government on society and against the popular will and interests. It is a government in fact, a de facto government.

Nevertheless, Mexico's armed forces have grassroots. His foot came from veteran men who formed the Constitutionalist army that fought the usurper and other revolutionary forces. Still Today is fed troops and officers from the popular classes. Among the leaders and generals hear the explanation, sometimes plaintively, "that most young people who join the military schools do not guided by a clear military vocation, but because the military education is still an option for the poor, provides housing, food, livelihood, career and social mobility. That's why the Mexican soldiers, with military education, training receive patriotic, inculcated by the doctrine, but supported at the origin of class.

military doctrine is not the invention of a visionary: a mining history, and knowledge of current aimed at meeting the objectives to be achieved. In the case of Mexico, higher levels of doctrine are patriotism, loyalty, courage, discipline, obedience, preparation and professional development. These values \u200b\u200bare grown at both the institutional and the personal, through the recollection of the events that give rise to the recognition of the acts that reiterate and reinforce conceptual methodical and systematic. It is necessary to supplement and update.

Loyalty to the president was a breakthrough of the Mexican military doctrine, but now, under the current circumstances in Mexico, the Americas and the world, the institution again military must step forward and raise that loyalty to the Republic, the Constitution, democracy and, ultimately, to the Mexican nation.

The de facto government's power comes from the institutions. Legitimate power comes from the people. Legitimate President of Mexico was invested by the people, Mr. Calderón, elevated by the oligarchy, was also rescued by the generals, without whose support has not been possible takeover.

MEXICO FOR A FAIR and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic!