disagrees with my delirium
ideas to the point of bitterness, as if they had the capacity to violate the most sacred of their property, not tolerate anyone thinks differently, their thoughts, their perceptions. As in the field of possibilities exist only one. Denying a priori the existence of any other possibility being that the reasoning in the field of ideas, to reach a specific point, there are many roads leading to it. Not all good, not all bad, but all different.
What I try is just expressing what I think is a possibility. Trying to stick as much as possible to the dictates of common sense, using as arguments the specific facts of reality that I live and I live, inferring from the facts sociological point of view as described by Vico. I, a human being, I'm not unlike any other. So I, an actor of my conscious lifetime, I would get up again to present my disagreement about the direction in which things in the country of my birth: Mexico. I do not accept the continued bombing of the "secretary of public education" (Televisa and TV Azteca) in which we do believe that we are the best way possible for social welfare, ignoring the state of social decay in which every time collapses more, the political and social system. But yet the entire effort is to keep up appearances, not to solve the root causes of decay social. Hypocrisy is the hallmark of this era. The common good no longer exists relativism with PAN theory underlying this is, in words that they like to hear a "fig tree" does not give the benefits they promised. Know the story of the barren fig tree!
The economic course is looming, dark, gloomy. The National Intelligence Council of the United States government (SIDA for its acronym in English) in his most resent report how does the future for 2020 says: "The global economy will be significantly larger, but there will be a significant gap between those who and have-nots "John
Gray in his book False Dawn, bolsters the idea that Mexico, along the lines of WB and IMF moves through the best route. The main storyline J. Gray, part of the idea developed by Karl Polanyi that the free market is not a natural phenomenon or spontaneous, a natural state that comes when you stop political interference in the trade but, rather, a product of state power, child of a strong centralized government and can not exist without it. A second line of argument has its origins in the thought of Joseph Schumpeter. Against those who condemn state intervention in the economy, Gray argues that, left to itself, capitalism is able to destroy liberal civilization that produced it. Should, therefore, be tamed to ensure social cohesion and stability. Without significant government intervention, market forces lead to a great social distress. Another
Gray develops arguments is that the identification is usually done between democracy and free markets is wrong. For Gray, one and other are not partners but competitors. As the free market undermines the social institutions and causes great economic insecurity generates a high political resistance. The answer to how to solve this puzzle also gives, but is skeptical, however believes that the only way is to: develop capitalism different according to different needs and not apply to the Washington consensus "vest."
not appear that Mr. Felipe Calderon understand this right, except those accompanying him on the continued imposition of this model, I think they are willing to continue deepening social decay. The Congress, especially the PRI and PAN showed signs of the same, approved the amendment to the law of ISSSTE. No encienten that social cohesion is based on job security.
In an essay published in the magazine Letras Libres in March 2007, the author Joseph S. Nye writes: "technological change can proceed, but can not be trusted equally government politicians. After all, economic globalization was forced to retreat a century ago by the confluence of war and the rise of communist and fascist ideologies that responded to social inequalities stronger every time. "" With our policies (USA)-regards this author - you have created more new terrorists than it eliminated ... and as a result justifies the loss of civil liberties within the liberal democracies. " If these are not valid arguments, dear reader, you forgive my folly, the product is, in my madness. Job
Cortés O
BY MEXICO JUSTO and without rancor, MEXICO NO ONE Liberal and Conservative? Fundemos The Fourth Republic! STORY 
0 comments:
Post a Comment