Monday, January 22, 2007
Selena Gomez Masterbate
The Fourth Republic
myth or Giovanbattista
Vico Giambattista Vico (1668-1744). Neapolitan lawyer was an Italian philosopher of history. Despite his humble origins (the son of a bookseller), he studied law and was professor of rhetoric for over forty years. In his work Principi d'una scienza nuova intorno alla natura delle Nazioni (1744) (known in Castilian as new science principles or new scientific principles. Around the common nature of nations ") in which case the principles of sociology as social science. In this work, one of the key points discussed to give an explanation of the social individual action is the MYTH.
Vico examines the fable and myth, which are mental constructs for carrying a definite sense within the daily coexistence. They are pre-concepts o prejuicios que orientan nuestra acción de cara a los otros sujetos y mediante esas tipificaciones compartidas la gente comprende el mundo en que vive y carece de importancia si acaso no les corresponde objetividad referencial alguna. En ese nivel lo que importa es que a través de de esas construcciones y obviedades transcurre la vida social.
Unas semanas atrás el Sr. Enrique Krause escribió un artículo el cual menciona que el fraude electoral es un MITO, en su lógica de escritura de dicho artículo nos quiere hacer sentir que tal cosa, el fraude no existió, por eso le llama mito. No acude siquiera, a la posibilidad, de tajo el fraude no existe y pensar en ello o mas, reclamar por el mismo es sacrílego pues en su lenguaje “mesiánico” would say that it is violating the sacrosanct. His writing is his thinking has its reason, you know that using the myth as a tool to legitimize the myth is possible because you get different readings because the myth is taken as the collective creation of entire villages thereby expressing its historical events , feelings, ethical and political conceptions, desires and perplexities, all in a language that logic, given the way of thinking of the time.
Continuing the analysis of myth could say that: The myth and history operate simultaneously in time and space, they represent different cognitive dimensions. As the story aims compete in the space of reason in the search for causal explanations, for objective reasons, determinants of behaviors, and enrolled in either argumentative logic, myth fixed in the collective consciousness category representations based on highly adjectival exclusion and differentiation, Rather than argue. Thus to say that fraud is a myth is like using an adjective, then it is not possible to argue.
But this is only one dimension of myth because as we saw at the beginning of this discussion the myths with their structures provide adequately for the construction of images about society, depth and significance levels higher than in other stories or those provided by history as an explanation. Its depth is related to the management of partially rooted notions of reason, but mostly on emotion and not conscious levels, while its significance depends on their relationship and their association with the supernatural. In addition to ordering capacity of thought, the myth contains a manipulable size, can be an ad-hoc speech, according to the interests of the narrator to tell time. It may seem that everyone who believes in the myth is a "mitotero", likes walking in the "mitote" because their actions are not founded on reason. Stressing the framework manipulated the myth in the discourse of different actors, the myth being embedded in social dynamics, which links the interests of social actors and in doing so removes the myth of the logical framework, synchronous. So write that fraud is a myth is not only denial but also adds an adjective to fraud and is out of the question. The other myth is that reading is useful also to distance himself from a political system because that way he is named as part of the pin and "today Mexico and changed." The truth is that in the construction of a collective imagination associated with the exercise of the story is told in a way that justifies and legitimizes one or more positions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment