No.7 Year 1
Republic Mail
political, economic and literary weekly newsletter
monterrey February 26, 2007
status
Given the political circumstances in which we live in the past 25 years of national life, and the repeated use in discourse of different terms by the political group with the sole purpose of legitimizing their actions using words like the word state. Therefore it is imperative philosophical analysis gives support to the rationale of the state. The poverty of spirit as we carry on our backs accursed inheritance, to which few "Living" slice removed, reduces the strength to achieve what we as individual and individual social concerns us, is not nothing but the satisfaction of basic needs of life has aimed to achieve happiness. That is the nature of the family, the peoples and states.
ostracism to which we are already accustomed, I firmly believe the cause of the vast majority of our misfortunes. Since ostracism is defined as the political Exile customary among the Athenians,
that was voluntary or forced exclusion from public office. And we as a society long ago that we are not interested in politics, perhaps never been interested, public affairs under the pretext that our obligation is to the family, which we have to work. Nothing else matters. Our mental laziness prevents us from investigating, reasoning fully our particular reality, our particular condition, and we only settle for what we spit opinion makers, as they digested and political affairs (third degree, three, etc.). because the media chosen as the bearers of truth, making us believe that the ends are advocating for the good of all. They hide their intentions behind the mask, the mask is well defined O. Peace in the Labyrinth of Solitude. What is at issue is the mask that hides the true interests, of their masters, the owners of the media. Do not forget that these interests are legitimate, what is not legitimate is the absence of control by the state to the legitimate interests of the less powerful are affected by the legitimate interests of the powerful. Meanwhile, we, sunk in our ostracism, we think these politicians will not matter under which they are entitled to others, or who are new, which for the first time in the history of mankind are discussed, but no: Aristotle 300 years before Christ and had a clear idea of \u200b\u200bwhat was the role of the state, wrote in his "Politics" that "Every state is obviously a association and any association not formed but in view of property, since men, whatever they are, never do anything but in view of what seems to be good be good. It is clear therefore that all the associations tend to a good of some kind, and that the most important of all goods should be the subject of the most important associations, one that contains all the others, and which just called State and political association. "Cosa in our present political development is not met, has never fully complied. And the interests that give meaning to power today, they have no interest to fulfill the ultimate goal of the state. Does the state make good things look bad, and bad things that look good, and confuse my ideas? Aristotle continues to support the organization of the state: "The association is natural and permanent family. (Who ate at the table, Coronda) (to be heated in the same household, Epimenides of Crete). The family is associated peoples and many peoples The association is the full statement, which comes, if I may say so, quite self-sufficient, having being caused by the necessities of life, and owe their livelihood (the state) to being as fulfilled.
Thus the state of nature should be provided, as are the first associations, whose ultimate goal is that, because the nature of a thing is its end, and what each one of the things when it has reached its full development is said to be its very nature, be it a man, a horse or a family. You can add that the destination and purpose of men is for them the first good, and self-reliance is at the same time, an end and happiness. "
in the state in which we live, which does not fulfill its function or in the words of Aristotle does not fulfill its purpose, as the nature of a thing is its end, in this case, "sufficient unto itself, having being caused by the necessities of life" and that no fulfill its nature, this thing is intended to be a state, it is not, that lost the way, I forget his last, his nature. Let us remember to remind him. Job
cores or
MEXICO FOR A FAIR and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic! 
0 comments:
Post a Comment