The number one goal of politicians, not away for even a second of it, is the struggle for power. The interests of society or country, are a fortiori, for them, in the background. Dealing with them (the interests of society) to the extent that they serve their cause (the attainment of power). A beneficial to society is not a political issue, if not he go political gains, close to areas of greatest poder; el mayor de todos, la Presidencia de la República. No perdamos el principio de realidad.
Continuando en este camino de la realidad, concientes que el político solo aspira al poder por el poder, sin importar las necesidades de su elector ya que solo realizara acciones a favor del ciudadano si le conviene a su único interés que es el poder. Por lo tanto no queda otra forma de control que la conciencia de realidad de la sociedad, que es la única capaz de autorregularse para poder sobrevivir. Y siendo que el individuo es la célula de acción; este debe de contar con la información necesaria de los conceptos que le darán las herramientas para formarse un pensamiento critico acerca de los que ejercen el poder. De Hence the critical reading and writing is what form the national consciousness. Television and radio will not, because they take the role of guardians of our consciousness, deciding for us what we have to watch and listen to train our critical thinking, which definitely is not suitable to their interests and not the interests of community. Therefore
is not uncommon for graduates in the U.S. economists, who have led our economy over the past 25 years, are not interested in the publishing industry, do not care. For example, Jaime Serra Puche said that "culture does not interest us" or Herminio Blanco "the best industrial policy is no policy industrial ", the best policy is no policy book of the book because it helps not to be critical citizens. And the Echeverria, Lopez Portillo, De la Madrid, Salinas, Zedillo, Fox, Calderón, liberal or not, the least they should is a critical society. So do not bet on reading, why create mega libraries for some, others do not count towards your interests, so undermine support for the schools of philosophy and plan them disappear in the dark.
The picture of the textbooks used in Mexico to teach philosophy is''very disappointing, "notes Gustavo Ortiz Millán, academic secretary of the Institute Philosophical Research of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM).
is thought, for example, that a philosopher can not contribute anything productive to society.
What would happen to Nuevo Leon and Mexico if philosophers cease to exist? Indeed a rare commodity.
was extinguished part of critical thinking that should have a country. ''Society should think about certain problems like the issue of morality, matters of logic, especially in light of the development of computing. OR political philosophy, philosophy of religion. It is worth thinking about it, to give another light to these problems and philosophers are for professional training, better able to do it. "And with a society that thirsts for knowledge, and quality sufficient material for reading and careful analysis.
Therefore the only weapon that has the individual and society to defend against the rapacity of the politician is the awareness of reality. Which only feeds on the reading and analysis of the different strands of critical thinking in our reality. Then, there is only enforce what the society as a whole you.
Large corporations have great philosophers, small companies simply do not have philosophers, and if they are small.
job cuts BY MEXICO JUSTO and without rancor, SIN MEXICO BY LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES,? Fundemos The Fourth Republic! 
0 comments:
Post a Comment