Kozlobaev
AG. Movement "For the Soviet Union"
Moscow, December 5, 2009.
There are minds so deceitful, that even the truth expressed by them, becomes a lie. P. Chaadaev
Burdiugov
Vladimir Viktorovich, leader of Russia's left " Politburo member of the Russian Communist Party of the Future (excision of part of the CPRF) lately in the seminars of the Institute of Philosophy, the magazine Kommunist, in other forums large and small routinely stirring up public opinion in philosophical circles left and their extravagant statements. The essence of these are reduced to saying, "the evil Soviets" misrepresented Marx mistakenly changed the address of the Manifesto of the Communist Party and from this all happened. The message
Valentina 30/11/2009 Tarasovna Bosenko under the theme of "Finding the answer to an eternal question: To be or not?" find "Part of the problem is to recognize the fact that after the death of VI Lenin's theory of scientific communism in full extension and necessary for the further development of society, has hardly been developed stagnate at the level of early twentieth century. Precisely this served to bankrupt the Soviet Union. "
Sorry but I can not recognize this. Does the current tragic time has not confirmed the position of IV Stalin "about the sharpening of class struggle as the building of socialism? Has he proven wrong Stalin's warning about the role of world Zionism? Did not Classic mode was resolved from the standpoint of Marxism, the national question in the USSR? Do you have proven wrong the fundamental economic law of socialism formulated by Stalin? Who arguably rejects? Is life not confirm what resolution rejecting the economic problems from the position of Marxism put forward by Stalin, we received what we have today? Is it from the consideration of the profound inter-imperialist contradictions from the Marxist position was not possible Soviet military alliance, the U.S. and Britain, which defeated fascism? And the experience of the country's industrialization, collectivization field of cultural revolution, the eradication of illiteracy generally implemented this by "the cult of personality" without the deep theoretical bases from the position of Marxism? A stake to the sky with your finger?.
The Communist Manifesto Burdiugov Royal is a sample from the ridicule of the anti-Soviet "man of the future." The outrageous claim already exists in the same name, where the word "real" author suggests that it was all abstract, virtual and behold, now found a strong base. Under the "manifesto" is understood "the call, the declaration of political party, social organization, program content and principles of action "(Soviet encyclopaedic dictionary, M., 1982). Burdiugov does not need Russia on the left ", the PCR of the Future or personally Communist Manifesto of the Real. He announces free, - "Meanwhile, construction of socialism was not finished at the time of the disintegration of the USSR in 1991." This country, which was the first to go to the Cosmos, resolved itself the problem of nuclear reaction directed thermonuclear synthesis, the only state of the planet that created a unified energy system, divided into 11 time zones. A country that demonstrated the superiority the socialist regime in the fight for his life in Europe under the boot-fascist Germany in 1941-45. Burdiugov show you any other country that has done this only independently. "Actually did not learn to use the superiority of social and state ownership in China or the USSR." Lies! The cutting-edge science in the world, the successes of the USSR in the Cosmos, in weaponry, art, sports are indisputable facts!. The economy of the Soviet Union gradually developed even to the counterrevolutionary coup in 1991. "After about ten years after 1936, the country and announced on the near completion of the construction of communism, but in fact, everything was still on the main stage of transition from capitalism to socialism. " Lie! "The country is not announced." Khrushchev
which is the instrument of international Zionism, the Trotskyist camouflage, the "father" of the present traitors of the USSR-Gorbachev, Yeltsin ... was devoted to discrediting the practice of 40 years of building socialism in the USSR, but removed soon. "To misrepresent the facts?. Here is the flask in hand, it is clear the line of water and dirt in the background. Shaking flask of different kinds of anti-Soviet desperately shouting "Look, everything is black and dirty." The era of socialism in the USSR has a clear line-the time of Stalin and the time of Khrushchev proactive and unnatural 1953-1991. Do not shake the flask of Soviet history, Burdiugov!. You offend us, the millions of Soviet citizens still live. Remember the words of Jean Jores, founder of the French Communist newspaper L'Humanité, - "The story should show not the ashes of the past, if not the fire".
"The dictatorship of the proletariat can not be assured as a form of power for a period of more than 30-40 years." This is a complete nonsense!. It all depends on the correlation of forces in the world. When the Soviet Union existed, it was possible socialist revolution in the DPRK, Cuba, in Vietnam. Under the direct influence of the USSR and its great victory plunged the colonial system of imperialism. Received the freedom and independence more than 2,500 million people in the earth. Here is the Titan Stalin. But for you and all your opponents are mob politics, the wind of history will lead to uncertainty. But Stalin winner of fascism loe people respect forever!.
But just changed the balance of power in the world as a result of the global conspiracy against the Soviet people and the violent dismemberment of the USSR, and disappeared from the world map the GDR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, but fascism has reared its head in Europe, the Baltic, in Ukraine. Calculate in advance any period is at least a parody to the Marxist theoretician. Burdiugov
introduces a definition of socialism - "socialism is a class society, society based on social ownership in the form of state system, which uses as a way to address the state with the attributes of the state, including the device management classes and subject to the specific interests of the class. "Everything was done exactly in the USSR! But according Burdiugov as by Gorbachev, this socialism is "without a human face"!.
Much can be learned from the examples of that crushing Burdiugov also also "historical junk" - the dictatorship of the proletariat, the administrative command system, the recognition of the planned under socialism, which "must not repeat the mistakes Soviet planning system, but have not been clarified them "mistakes." Loa
propagandists of the so-called "personal property" taken Chizhikov Petrujin with theories on what "for the account of each member of society will be passed as an initial capital in total, determined by the possibilities of the state economy. "What is the initial capital and how is it calculated? When, where and who is going to start? What is it: the amount of money, the factory, factory, office or store? And private companies, why not participate in the "payment of this initial capital ...? "This is not a prototype Khrushchev if not the" real communism "? "Companies must be completely independent in the choice of enumeration of production, as well as volumes of production." Here's what he said the immediate parent The new "elite" of a number of Liberal-communists. Does the "elite" without trying to imitate something, eat well and why someone should take up the lights? "We emphasize this, and will not go!
Moscow, December 5, 2009.
There are minds so deceitful, that even the truth expressed by them, becomes a lie. P. Chaadaev
Burdiugov
Vladimir Viktorovich, leader of Russia's left " Politburo member of the Russian Communist Party of the Future (excision of part of the CPRF) lately in the seminars of the Institute of Philosophy, the magazine Kommunist, in other forums large and small routinely stirring up public opinion in philosophical circles left and their extravagant statements. The essence of these are reduced to saying, "the evil Soviets" misrepresented Marx mistakenly changed the address of the Manifesto of the Communist Party and from this all happened. The message
Valentina 30/11/2009 Tarasovna Bosenko under the theme of "Finding the answer to an eternal question: To be or not?" find "Part of the problem is to recognize the fact that after the death of VI Lenin's theory of scientific communism in full extension and necessary for the further development of society, has hardly been developed stagnate at the level of early twentieth century. Precisely this served to bankrupt the Soviet Union. "
Sorry but I can not recognize this. Does the current tragic time has not confirmed the position of IV Stalin "about the sharpening of class struggle as the building of socialism? Has he proven wrong Stalin's warning about the role of world Zionism? Did not Classic mode was resolved from the standpoint of Marxism, the national question in the USSR? Do you have proven wrong the fundamental economic law of socialism formulated by Stalin? Who arguably rejects? Is life not confirm what resolution rejecting the economic problems from the position of Marxism put forward by Stalin, we received what we have today? Is it from the consideration of the profound inter-imperialist contradictions from the Marxist position was not possible Soviet military alliance, the U.S. and Britain, which defeated fascism? And the experience of the country's industrialization, collectivization field of cultural revolution, the eradication of illiteracy generally implemented this by "the cult of personality" without the deep theoretical bases from the position of Marxism? A stake to the sky with your finger?.
The Communist Manifesto Burdiugov Royal is a sample from the ridicule of the anti-Soviet "man of the future." The outrageous claim already exists in the same name, where the word "real" author suggests that it was all abstract, virtual and behold, now found a strong base. Under the "manifesto" is understood "the call, the declaration of political party, social organization, program content and principles of action "(Soviet encyclopaedic dictionary, M., 1982). Burdiugov does not need Russia on the left ", the PCR of the Future or personally Communist Manifesto of the Real. He announces free, - "Meanwhile, construction of socialism was not finished at the time of the disintegration of the USSR in 1991." This country, which was the first to go to the Cosmos, resolved itself the problem of nuclear reaction directed thermonuclear synthesis, the only state of the planet that created a unified energy system, divided into 11 time zones. A country that demonstrated the superiority the socialist regime in the fight for his life in Europe under the boot-fascist Germany in 1941-45. Burdiugov show you any other country that has done this only independently. "Actually did not learn to use the superiority of social and state ownership in China or the USSR." Lies! The cutting-edge science in the world, the successes of the USSR in the Cosmos, in weaponry, art, sports are indisputable facts!. The economy of the Soviet Union gradually developed even to the counterrevolutionary coup in 1991. "After about ten years after 1936, the country and announced on the near completion of the construction of communism, but in fact, everything was still on the main stage of transition from capitalism to socialism. " Lie! "The country is not announced." Khrushchev
which is the instrument of international Zionism, the Trotskyist camouflage, the "father" of the present traitors of the USSR-Gorbachev, Yeltsin ... was devoted to discrediting the practice of 40 years of building socialism in the USSR, but removed soon. "To misrepresent the facts?. Here is the flask in hand, it is clear the line of water and dirt in the background. Shaking flask of different kinds of anti-Soviet desperately shouting "Look, everything is black and dirty." The era of socialism in the USSR has a clear line-the time of Stalin and the time of Khrushchev proactive and unnatural 1953-1991. Do not shake the flask of Soviet history, Burdiugov!. You offend us, the millions of Soviet citizens still live. Remember the words of Jean Jores, founder of the French Communist newspaper L'Humanité, - "The story should show not the ashes of the past, if not the fire".
"The dictatorship of the proletariat can not be assured as a form of power for a period of more than 30-40 years." This is a complete nonsense!. It all depends on the correlation of forces in the world. When the Soviet Union existed, it was possible socialist revolution in the DPRK, Cuba, in Vietnam. Under the direct influence of the USSR and its great victory plunged the colonial system of imperialism. Received the freedom and independence more than 2,500 million people in the earth. Here is the Titan Stalin. But for you and all your opponents are mob politics, the wind of history will lead to uncertainty. But Stalin winner of fascism loe people respect forever!.
But just changed the balance of power in the world as a result of the global conspiracy against the Soviet people and the violent dismemberment of the USSR, and disappeared from the world map the GDR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, but fascism has reared its head in Europe, the Baltic, in Ukraine. Calculate in advance any period is at least a parody to the Marxist theoretician. Burdiugov
introduces a definition of socialism - "socialism is a class society, society based on social ownership in the form of state system, which uses as a way to address the state with the attributes of the state, including the device management classes and subject to the specific interests of the class. "Everything was done exactly in the USSR! But according Burdiugov as by Gorbachev, this socialism is "without a human face"!.
Much can be learned from the examples of that crushing Burdiugov also also "historical junk" - the dictatorship of the proletariat, the administrative command system, the recognition of the planned under socialism, which "must not repeat the mistakes Soviet planning system, but have not been clarified them "mistakes." Loa
propagandists of the so-called "personal property" taken Chizhikov Petrujin with theories on what "for the account of each member of society will be passed as an initial capital in total, determined by the possibilities of the state economy. "What is the initial capital and how is it calculated? When, where and who is going to start? What is it: the amount of money, the factory, factory, office or store? And private companies, why not participate in the "payment of this initial capital ...? "This is not a prototype Khrushchev if not the" real communism "? "Companies must be completely independent in the choice of enumeration of production, as well as volumes of production." Here's what he said the immediate parent The new "elite" of a number of Liberal-communists. Does the "elite" without trying to imitate something, eat well and why someone should take up the lights? "We emphasize this, and will not go!
The manifesto of real communism is "the formation of new socialist relations of production" but did not reveal its essence. "Under an impartial analysis the reader will surely come to the deduction, which the Soviet Union until the very end of his life was in a stage of development, which can only be characterized as a bureaucratic state socialism." Lie disgusting!. I declare, until 1953 there was another Soviet Union, which showed such rhythms of development is not known to mankind. In a blink of an eye as measured by the history, the country was taken out of poverty, underdevelopment and illiteracy. Precisely the USSR also beat the fascists, but here that appeared after the "followers" of Marx and the evolution of private property in the USSR from 1953 to 1991, because of their acts are: the dismemberment of the country united, the Soviet people and the appearance of the FR-mafia oligarchy of the "rich" Ukraine, the Fascist Ba'ltico, etc.
Grace the manifesto of real communism is the confirmation that the work of Marx's "evil Soviets" wrote the "abolition of private property," but according Burdiugov should be "revoked private property." But our reason So much gives you all the same? It is equally important the person will jump!. A series of assumptions for this calculation can be very easy, "abolition annexation ban liquidation.." However Burdiugov in this world presents to the nomenclature of the party and power in the USSR, called catch and run sledgehammers to destroy the machines, production lines, appliances, computers, "destroying private property." Here I understand, everything is hidden behind a curtain verbal those "crocodile tears" over the repression and the "liquidation of the kulaks as a class" for 25 years discharged the pseudo current and traitors from power.
To my surprise I saw that Burdiugov not just one person, but a AVATAR, for declaring "that others did not consider such a manifesto", he knows perfectly well that those they had in mind. The central thought of the manifesto of real communism is that the exploitation of man by man takes place not only on private property bourgeois, but also any other property. Truly, this was demonstrated by the practice of the USSR poststalinista. The state and party nomenclature even in the form of state (social) property, could exploit the workers, transforming their position in the production, distribution system, a business and a service area in a dark-capital . Burdiugov beautifully "hits" to Soviet socialism, announcing that "the conservation of agricultural production has allowed the depreciation as a natural decline of the deterioration of up to 50% of production for conservation season. But transport production by plane from Moscow, for example, Yakutsk and Magadan to 7-10 hours of flight allowed amortization of 5% to 25% of oranges, eggs, etc.. " For the conviction would be necessary to indicate the sources, otherwise it is looking at this with an original libel. Burdiugov
stubbornly defends private property even under communism, exclaiming with great passion, "attempts to ban it, they are useless!". And promises to build such a form of ownership, including private, which will exempt the very possibility of exploitation of man by the property. Burdiugov has in mind the personal property while he was a secret, but not in the manifesto of communism real. Almost a question arises, how to eliminate this same farm, which can exist under different forms of ownership, what bestiality is this?. Burdiugov does not give answers, then give him. Under the holding understand the application of moral and material loss to society and the citizen.
Look at some examples. Suppose, Burdiugov have a car, although here he gives "kicking" the CPSU, "direct understanding of the indications of the" manifesto "led to what in the Soviet Union a decade later than in Western developed mass production automobiles. " What a fierce hatred for all things Soviet!. You wonder, who gave birth to the Soviet power. I was drinking, eating, they should, but they were his enemies and cosmopolitan. It turns out that only knocked Stalin ruling circles but lived deep roots. The current difficult times they have not been exposed ... Yes, thank God, though decades have breathed normal air! The personal self-mobilization is the strategic error of the direction of the USSR!. Their negative result is evident today, particularly in Moscow, Leningrad and other major cities. Heightened individualism and private property interest together with other factors led to the erosion of socialism in the USSR. The car in the USSR related to power personal property. As my old aunt said pointing to the "Lada" parked in front of the window, "we expropriated by three horses, but for the car in 70 years nothing!". The herd of horses in personal property, why? Back to Burdiugov
Grace the manifesto of real communism is the confirmation that the work of Marx's "evil Soviets" wrote the "abolition of private property," but according Burdiugov should be "revoked private property." But our reason So much gives you all the same? It is equally important the person will jump!. A series of assumptions for this calculation can be very easy, "abolition annexation ban liquidation.." However Burdiugov in this world presents to the nomenclature of the party and power in the USSR, called catch and run sledgehammers to destroy the machines, production lines, appliances, computers, "destroying private property." Here I understand, everything is hidden behind a curtain verbal those "crocodile tears" over the repression and the "liquidation of the kulaks as a class" for 25 years discharged the pseudo current and traitors from power.
To my surprise I saw that Burdiugov not just one person, but a AVATAR, for declaring "that others did not consider such a manifesto", he knows perfectly well that those they had in mind. The central thought of the manifesto of real communism is that the exploitation of man by man takes place not only on private property bourgeois, but also any other property. Truly, this was demonstrated by the practice of the USSR poststalinista. The state and party nomenclature even in the form of state (social) property, could exploit the workers, transforming their position in the production, distribution system, a business and a service area in a dark-capital . Burdiugov beautifully "hits" to Soviet socialism, announcing that "the conservation of agricultural production has allowed the depreciation as a natural decline of the deterioration of up to 50% of production for conservation season. But transport production by plane from Moscow, for example, Yakutsk and Magadan to 7-10 hours of flight allowed amortization of 5% to 25% of oranges, eggs, etc.. " For the conviction would be necessary to indicate the sources, otherwise it is looking at this with an original libel. Burdiugov
stubbornly defends private property even under communism, exclaiming with great passion, "attempts to ban it, they are useless!". And promises to build such a form of ownership, including private, which will exempt the very possibility of exploitation of man by the property. Burdiugov has in mind the personal property while he was a secret, but not in the manifesto of communism real. Almost a question arises, how to eliminate this same farm, which can exist under different forms of ownership, what bestiality is this?. Burdiugov does not give answers, then give him. Under the holding understand the application of moral and material loss to society and the citizen.
Look at some examples. Suppose, Burdiugov have a car, although here he gives "kicking" the CPSU, "direct understanding of the indications of the" manifesto "led to what in the Soviet Union a decade later than in Western developed mass production automobiles. " What a fierce hatred for all things Soviet!. You wonder, who gave birth to the Soviet power. I was drinking, eating, they should, but they were his enemies and cosmopolitan. It turns out that only knocked Stalin ruling circles but lived deep roots. The current difficult times they have not been exposed ... Yes, thank God, though decades have breathed normal air! The personal self-mobilization is the strategic error of the direction of the USSR!. Their negative result is evident today, particularly in Moscow, Leningrad and other major cities. Heightened individualism and private property interest together with other factors led to the erosion of socialism in the USSR. The car in the USSR related to power personal property. As my old aunt said pointing to the "Lada" parked in front of the window, "we expropriated by three horses, but for the car in 70 years nothing!". The herd of horses in personal property, why? Back to Burdiugov
. Paying for tax on the private car, say 10 rubles a year (according to Soviet prices), Burdiugov afternoon, after work as needed supplies to citizens. The returns of the tax of 10 rubles for a couple of evenings, hauling in the rest of days will give a fair income for your pocket. Failure to pay income tax from the use of public roads, parking places, air pollution, breathing citizens, contributing to the detriment of their health, is the direct loss to society material. Burdiugov may object that he does not practice the run. But he uses the entire city infrastructure (streets, parking on footpaths, garages, supplies, laundry in the city, etc.) Car and sent to air leakage (leakage of a "Lada" in a hours going at a speed of 60-70 km / h submitted releases for 10 citizens). In people who develop cancers, bronchitis, etc.., Ie, walk the degradation of the country's population. Lost?. Of course! You go and exploit all!.
Second example. Burdiugov sick with flu. Wishing to get their "discoveries" on the wrong change Marx's work, he has come to the seminar at the Institute of Philosophy. Sneezing and coughing to the right and left, he has intervened, to illustrate the issue, has responded to questions. The next day 10 people who sat near him have become ill with flu. Burdiugov have been infected. Lost?. For citizens and for society!.
The third, more exotic example. Burdiugov has married a girl 30 years younger than him. "But so what, this is my business," - say Burdiugov. But this moral challenge for society, is the demonstration of the account, the profit from the sale of relationships, but not natural relationships based on love. In other words, monetarism and the account in the relations of men and women has been the norm. The society is doomed to degradation.
Burdiugov If we forgive, do not add any negative test. The examples show that using the personal property a man can not exploit a specific person, if not the entire society. In Secondly, the power of the harm to society by man is the mass and eliminate the damage that has a material and moral aspect is not possible. How can it be?. Even the Soviet sociological science came to a definite conclusion, at the center of it all is the man. In this, as its moral aspect, will determine the fate not only of the particular community, but also of all humanity. Here is also clear strategic genius of Marx, if the question under what social organization is possible the formation of a moral and spiritual man and of society?. "In a society where property dominates Private, remaining the fight and competition and the law of life is "the man is a wolf to man" or society which is dominated by public ownership (state) and the law of life is the commandment, "the man is a friend, brother and comrade the man, "one for all and all for one"?. Burdiugov But, unfortunately, "the creation of a new man" often annoys. For us, the Marxist doctrine is omnipotent because it is fair. And here "the accuracy of Marxism" of Burdiugov is a lot of nasty words!. His manifesto of real communism is that Khrushchev, improvisation anti-Soviet, not one prompted by the mass of workers. Because and are harmless "left Russia, the PCR of the Future, the CPRF.
The Burdiugov futurology about the time of "scientific socialism", when socialism is a scientist from the first day of birth, on "the transition period from socialism to communism" on other pursuits, are related to the promises President trivial of RF Medvedev-"Aj, that it will live in 2020!". But meanwhile the trains derailed, Centra collapses Sayano-Shushenskaya Hydroelectric fall airplanes, buildings explode, burning the homes ...
But the reality is that Russia is the extreme sharpening of national contradictions, in fact, the stage of national liberation struggle is unknown. Why?. Because rogue Zyuganov did everything to "bury communism," and those activists as they trample Burdiugov experience of the heroic Soviet era, nothing has been contrasted either theoretically or organisationally.
And if you assume that concludes with the victory stage of the national liberation struggle in Russia, then and tomorrow will require solving the problem of direct popular power, which in the post "Impuls" will and endeavor DV Paramonov resolve. The inclusion of creative potential everything depends on the people. And if each person feels that he is "sovereign" that their voice means a lot, both local and state level, then this is completely and another town, to which everything is at your strength. For the second day will also require the resolution of monetary circulation, to which the message will "Impuls" Comrade Volobuev. And if the money supply and the issue is in the hands of the state (as in the USSR), then this will become a powerful lever, when almost to disappear any difference between any form of ownership. And if the circulation of money and issuance of national currency are in the hands of private banks, which still depends on the International Monetary Fund (as currently in the FR), entoncesa in this case is not warranted life or d elas state enterprises or private.
Very interesting and current material "New look for economic policy" of Udilov and even personal property of the reactionary anti-Soviet known to my Putrujin group, and the message takes into account that the world economy was growing because of the remoteness of man from the means of production.
Any scientific discipline of engineering starts from the definition of terms and concepts. Why admit though provisional priority, terms and definitions Atsiukovski prepared by gradually specified and supplemented?. In short I think the project should be one such expert advice, which accepts everything, absolutely all socially important problems. These discussions lime and reveals the usefulness of the idea, which takes the variant accomplished and published in the materials (web). I suggest to the public to know that the "new socialist manifesto" is no worse than Burdiugov.
Second example. Burdiugov sick with flu. Wishing to get their "discoveries" on the wrong change Marx's work, he has come to the seminar at the Institute of Philosophy. Sneezing and coughing to the right and left, he has intervened, to illustrate the issue, has responded to questions. The next day 10 people who sat near him have become ill with flu. Burdiugov have been infected. Lost?. For citizens and for society!.
The third, more exotic example. Burdiugov has married a girl 30 years younger than him. "But so what, this is my business," - say Burdiugov. But this moral challenge for society, is the demonstration of the account, the profit from the sale of relationships, but not natural relationships based on love. In other words, monetarism and the account in the relations of men and women has been the norm. The society is doomed to degradation.
Burdiugov If we forgive, do not add any negative test. The examples show that using the personal property a man can not exploit a specific person, if not the entire society. In Secondly, the power of the harm to society by man is the mass and eliminate the damage that has a material and moral aspect is not possible. How can it be?. Even the Soviet sociological science came to a definite conclusion, at the center of it all is the man. In this, as its moral aspect, will determine the fate not only of the particular community, but also of all humanity. Here is also clear strategic genius of Marx, if the question under what social organization is possible the formation of a moral and spiritual man and of society?. "In a society where property dominates Private, remaining the fight and competition and the law of life is "the man is a wolf to man" or society which is dominated by public ownership (state) and the law of life is the commandment, "the man is a friend, brother and comrade the man, "one for all and all for one"?. Burdiugov But, unfortunately, "the creation of a new man" often annoys. For us, the Marxist doctrine is omnipotent because it is fair. And here "the accuracy of Marxism" of Burdiugov is a lot of nasty words!. His manifesto of real communism is that Khrushchev, improvisation anti-Soviet, not one prompted by the mass of workers. Because and are harmless "left Russia, the PCR of the Future, the CPRF.
The Burdiugov futurology about the time of "scientific socialism", when socialism is a scientist from the first day of birth, on "the transition period from socialism to communism" on other pursuits, are related to the promises President trivial of RF Medvedev-"Aj, that it will live in 2020!". But meanwhile the trains derailed, Centra collapses Sayano-Shushenskaya Hydroelectric fall airplanes, buildings explode, burning the homes ...
But the reality is that Russia is the extreme sharpening of national contradictions, in fact, the stage of national liberation struggle is unknown. Why?. Because rogue Zyuganov did everything to "bury communism," and those activists as they trample Burdiugov experience of the heroic Soviet era, nothing has been contrasted either theoretically or organisationally.
And if you assume that concludes with the victory stage of the national liberation struggle in Russia, then and tomorrow will require solving the problem of direct popular power, which in the post "Impuls" will and endeavor DV Paramonov resolve. The inclusion of creative potential everything depends on the people. And if each person feels that he is "sovereign" that their voice means a lot, both local and state level, then this is completely and another town, to which everything is at your strength. For the second day will also require the resolution of monetary circulation, to which the message will "Impuls" Comrade Volobuev. And if the money supply and the issue is in the hands of the state (as in the USSR), then this will become a powerful lever, when almost to disappear any difference between any form of ownership. And if the circulation of money and issuance of national currency are in the hands of private banks, which still depends on the International Monetary Fund (as currently in the FR), entoncesa in this case is not warranted life or d elas state enterprises or private.
Very interesting and current material "New look for economic policy" of Udilov and even personal property of the reactionary anti-Soviet known to my Putrujin group, and the message takes into account that the world economy was growing because of the remoteness of man from the means of production.
Any scientific discipline of engineering starts from the definition of terms and concepts. Why admit though provisional priority, terms and definitions Atsiukovski prepared by gradually specified and supplemented?. In short I think the project should be one such expert advice, which accepts everything, absolutely all socially important problems. These discussions lime and reveals the usefulness of the idea, which takes the variant accomplished and published in the materials (web). I suggest to the public to know that the "new socialist manifesto" is no worse than Burdiugov.
[Fecha de la última consulta: 27 de diciembre de 2009]
TEXTO ORIGINAL :
December 5, 2009.
ANTIMANIFEST BURDYUGOVA
«There are minds so false that even the truth expressed by them, becomes a lie." P. Chaadaev
Vladimir Burdyugov (hereafter CDH), the leader of the party left Russia, the Politburo member AUCPB (All-Russia Communist Party of the Future - a splinter of CPRF) has recently at seminars at the Institute of Philosophy, in the edited journal of the "Communist" on other large and small forums regularly "explode" philosophical and left the public for his extravagant statements. Their essence boils down to that, they say, "Soviet evil individuals" perverted Marx's wrong transferred to the verb in the "Communist Manifesto" and it all went away and drove off.
The newsletter Valentina Tarasovny Bosenko on 11.30.2009 under the theme "Finding an answer the eternal question: To Be or Not To Be? "meet -" One aspect of the problem - to recognize the fact that after the departure of Lenin's life, the theory of scientific communism in full and to the extent necessary for the further development of society, hardly evolved, it seems to be stuck at the beginning of the twentieth century. That is what was the collapse of Soviet Union. " Sorry, but I can not accept. Is the current tragic time did not confirm the position of Stalin, "the intensification of class struggle As the construction of socialism "? Did Stalin's warning turned out to be wrong about the role of world Zionism? Was not classically, from the standpoint of Marxism solving the national question in the USSR? Is was wrong, Stalin formulated the basic economic law of socialism? Its someone argued rejected? Is not life confirmed that, by rejecting a decision from the perspective of Marxism, the economic issues raised by Stalin, we got what we deserve Today in the window? Is it not from the accounts of deep inter-imperialist contradictions from the perspective of Marxism became possible military alliance between the Soviet Union, the USA and UK which threw the German fascism? And the experience of industrialization, collectivization of agriculture, cultural revolution, the elimination of illiteracy, all-embracing, that is all implanted "personality cult", without deep theoretical justification from the standpoint of Marxism? Pointing at the sky?
real communist manifesto (ISC) CDH - a sample of anti-Soviet mockingly, "the man of the future." Immense pretentiousness is already present in the title, where the word "real" the author makes it clear that, say, to him it was all abstract and virtual, and now has gained a firm footing. Under the "manifesto" means "proclamation, the declaration political party, social organization, containing the program and principles "(Soviet Encyclopedia, Moscow, 1982). CDH does not specify from "Left of Russia", from The CFS or on their own to IRAs. He unsubstantiated claims - "Meanwhile, the construction of socialism, had not been completed and the time of the collapse of the USSR in 1991. It is a country which was the first in the world went into space, has solved the problem independently controlled nuclear reaction, nuclear fusion, the only State of the planet, creating a single energy system, located in 11 time zones? The country, which has proven superiority of the socialist failure in the battle for life and death the whole of Europe, lying under the nazi jackboot in 1941 45g.g.? CDH, you specify a different beloved country, which alone, independently made the same. "Effectively take advantage of state or public property in China or the Soviet Union and have not learned." Lies! Advanced in the world of science, the successes of the Soviet Union in space, weapons, art, sports is an indisputable fact! The Soviet economy has developed steadily up to the counter-revolutionary coup in 1991. "After a few decades after 1936., The country has to report about the imminent completion of communism, but in fact, still remained at the initial stage of transition from capitalism to socialism. " Lies! "The country did not report." That Khrushchev - a tool of international Zionism, disguised as a Trotskyist "Father" of today's traitors of the USSR - Gorbachev, Yeltsin ... engaged in the practice of discrediting the 40-year path of building socialism in the USSR, but was quickly removed. Why distort the facts? That is in the hands of bulb, it can be seen a clear dividing line of water and mud on the bottom. Shaking flask, various anti-Soviet poshiba heart-rending wail, - "Look, all black and dirty!". The era of socialism, the USSR has a clear dividing line - the time of Stalin and anti-scientific, voluntaristic hruschevschina 1953 91g.g. Do not shake flask of Soviet history, VVB! You are insulting us, millions of Soviet citizens living. Remember the words of Jean Jaures, the founder of the newspaper the French Communists "L'Humanite", - "History should not display the ashes of the past, and its fire!".
«dictatorship of the proletariat can not be a form of power is greater than the period 30-40 years. " That's absurd! It all depends on the balance of power in the world. That was the Soviet Union became possible socialist revolution in North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam. Under the direct influence of the USSR and its great victory collapsed colonial system of imperialism. Freedom and independence were more than two and a half billion people on earth! Here's a titanium Stalin and all his detractors - the political riff-raff, which is the first wind of history will carry into the unknown. A Stalin-Winner fascism, people will honor forever!
But once changed the balance of power in the world, due to an international conspiracy against the Soviet people and forced dismemberment of the USSR disappeared from the world map the GDR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, raised his head and fascism in Europe, the Baltics, Ukraine. Determine in advance a term - is, at least, a parody of a Marxist theoretician.
CDH introduces the definition of socialism - Socialism - a class society, a society based on public property in the form of government, a system that uses a form of state control, with all of the state attributes, including class device management and suppression in the interests of certain classes. " Everything is exactly realized in the USSR! But for CDH, as well as by Gorbachev - is Socialism is not "human face"!
Many can cite an example that the nails CDH: there are "historical junk" - the dictatorship of the proletariat, the ACS (administrative command system), but without the examples where it does not exist (!), recognition of planning under socialism, which "must not repeat the mistakes of the Soviet planning system, but themselves "bugs" were found.
have advocates of so-called "personalized Property Petrukhin Chizhikova borrowed from the idea that "At the expense of every member of society will be transferred to the same start-up capital in an amount determined by the capabilities of the state economy." What is this "Seed money" and how is it calculated? When, where and who will "start"? What it is: the amount of money, plant, factory, office or retail outlet? A private enterprise, why not participate in the transfer of seed capital ... "? What is not Khrushchev's prototype, but the "real communism"?
«Enterprises should be completely independent in choosing, as the list of products and volumes of production. " That showed up the next father of the new "elite" from among the Liberal communists! Hence, the "elite" will have something to imitate not natruzhivayas, eat well, but someone has to work hard for it? We have already tried this, no way!
in IRAs is the "formation of new, socialist relations of production, but not disclosed to their essence. "In an unbiased analysis of the reader will certainly come to the conclusion that the Soviet Union until the end of its existence is at the stage of development, which alone can be characterized as "bureaucratic state socialism. " Abominable lie! I declare before 1953. was a Soviet Union, which has shown such growth rates, which are not aware of humanity. In an instant by the standards of history of the country was to escape from poverty, underdevelopment and illiteracy. It is this the USSR and defeated Nazis, but then came "qualifiers" of Marx and private property Evolution of the Soviet Union from 1953 to 1991g.g. - The case of their hands and then fragmentation of a single country, the Soviet people and the phenomenon of mafia-oligarchic eReFii, "independence" of Ukraine, Baltic pro-Nazi, etc.
highlight of MPK is the assertion that the writings of Marx, "the Soviet evil individuals" wrote "the destruction of private property, and for CDH should be "the abolition of private property." That is to say not sufficient at ruzhishko, and perhaps kontsensus! But in our umishko - is that the forehead, that forehead? Still bump jump! A number of speculations on this subject can be quite long: "abolition, rejection, prohibition, elimination and so on Moreover, CDH in this light exposes the power and the party nomenclature in the Soviet Union, which it supposedly encouraged, almost not enough to run a sledgehammer and smashing machines, machines, production lines, equipment, computers, destroying private property. " Here, as I understand it, hiding behind a veil of words all the same "crocodile tears" about the persecution and elimination of kulaks as a class, that 25 years is poured current lzhedemokraty and traitors in power.
surprised to see that CDH is not just a man, and AVATAR, for saying "nothing like the authors of the Manifesto did not have in mind, he knows perfectly well what they had in mind! central idea of \u200b\u200bIRAs is that the exploitation of man by man generates not only the bourgeois private property, but also any other property. True, this practice has proved the post-Stalin Soviet Union. Partgoshoznomenklatura, even when the state (nation-wide) form of ownership, managed to exploit workers, transforming their position at work, in the system distribution, trade and services - in the shadow capital. CDH nice "beats" of Soviet socialism, declaring that "storage of agricultural products to admit a debt, as attrition due to damage, up to 50% of the production of the season storage. A shipment of products by air from Moscow, for instance, in Yakutsk or Magadan for 7-10 hours of flight allowed to write off 5% to 25% of the oranges, eggs, etc. ". Once the chickens had time to lay eggs, because in them, as I recall, there was no shortage? For credibility necessary to specify the sources, or it looks primitive slander.
CDH persistently protects private property, even under communism, exclaiming with great feeling, - "attempts to ban it, futile! And promises to construct a form of property, including public and private, which will eliminate most the possibility of exploitation of man by the owner. Whether CDH is referring to personal property, whether it is still his know-how, but a new form of IRAs do not. Rises practical question, how to isolate this same "service" that can be in various forms of ownership, what is this beast is? CDH does not ответов, тогда возьмём это на себя. Под эксплуатацией будем понимать нанесение материального, морального ущерба обществу и отдельному гражданину.
Рассмотрим examples. Suppose CDH has a car, although here it is "kicking" the Communist Party - a "direct understanding of indications of the Manifesto" and led to the fact that in the Soviet Union a decade later than in the West, began to develop the mass production of cars. " What a ferocious hatred of everything the Soviet! Wonder who gave birth to the Soviet regime. Gave to drink, fed and healed them, but they were by her haters and cosmopolitans. It turns out that Stalin only tops shot down, and the roots are deeply entrenched. But the current lihoe time exposed them ... Yes, thank God, at least "a decade" breathed normal air! Personal motorization - A strategic error of the USSR leadership! Its negative effects are evident today, particularly in Moscow, Leningrad and other major cities. It increased individualism and private property interest in that, including with other factors, led to the erosion of socialism in the USSR. The car carried the authority of the USSR to personal property. Somehow, my elderly aunt said, pointing to the Lada, which was standing in front of the window - "We three horses dispossessed, and in it as much as 70 and nothing!". A herd of horses in private ownership! For what?
return to CDH. Paying the tax for private cars, we put 10 rubles. per year (according to Soviet rates), CDH in the evening, after work drives up the need for citizens. Ten of the tax will return in a couple of evenings, carting in the remaining days will give him a net profit in your pocket. Failure to pay tax on income use of public roads, parking areas, pollution of the air breathed by the citizens, harming your health, there is a direct property damage society. CDH could argue that he is not engaged in carting. But he enjoys all the city's infrastructure (roads, parking on footpaths, garages, clams, refueling, cleaning in the city, etc.) and your car pollutant (exhaust Ladas one hour drive at a speed of 60-70 km / hour poison the air 10 citizens). People develop cancer, broncho-pulmonary, etc. disease, ie is the degradation of the population. Damage? Sure! One travels, and operates all!
second example. Breaker with the flu. Wanting to bring his "discovery" about the mistranslation of the works of Marx, he arrived at a seminar at the Institute of Philosophy. Sneezing and coughing right to left, he spoke, highlighted the theme, answered questions. The next day 10 people that sat beside him, sick with the flu. CDH they infect. Damage? Both citizens and society!
third, quite an exotic example. CDH married, having a girl 30 years younger than himself. "So what is a private matter?" - Says CDH. But it is a moral challenge to society, there is a demonstration of the calculation, the benefits of commodity relations, but not the natural relationship based on love. In other words monetarism and the calculation of relations between men and women became the norm. Society is doomed to degradation.
May God forgive us CDH, no negatives, we do not ascribe to him. Examples show that, using personal property, a person can not exploit a specific person, but all of society. Secondly, the methods of applying человеком ущерба обществу - масса, а вычленить этот ущерб, имеющий материальный и морально-нравственный аспект - невозможно. Как же быть? Ещё советская обществоведческая science has come to a correct conclusion - in the center of it all stands a man. From that, what is the moral ethos, determine the fate not only of the specific community but of all mankind. It is here that and it becomes clear strategic genius of Marx, if you put the question under which social structure may becoming highly spiritual, moral, moral man and society? In a society dominated by private ownership, a constant struggle and competition, and the law of life is "a man is a wolf or a society dominated by the public (government) property and the law life are the commandments, "the man to man a friend, comrade and brother", "One for all and all for one"? But for CDH, unfortunately, all this "many times painfully familiar - Creation of a new man ". For us, the "teaching of Marx is omnipotent because it is true, but the" refinement of Marxism "is a pile of rotting Burdyugovym words! His MRK - all the same hruschovschina, anti-Soviet gag, no arming the masses. Because it is so toothless "left Russia," The CFS, the Communist Party, which he zeal and fervor constantly swooped.
Futures breaker strip of "scientific socialism" when scientific socialism is the first of his birthday, the "transition period from socialism to communism, other surveys similar to the promises of cheap Russian President Medvedev - "oh, how well we live in 2020!". And while flying train derailed, falls Sayano-Shushenskaya GES, falling aircraft, buildings explode, burn nursing homes, but every day you hear of tele ... "as well beautiful marquise ... ".
But the realities of the day are such that in Russia there is a sharp intensification of national conflicts, in fact, a national liberation phase struggle becomes inevitable. Why? Yes, because the renegades Zyuganov did their best to bury communism ", and such figures as CDH, trampling experience of the Soviet heroic age, nothing could oppose neither theoretically nor organizationally.
If we assume that a victory will end the national-liberation stage of the struggle in Russia, then already for tomorrow will require a solution of direct democracy, which is on the dispatch of "Impulse" sets up and tries to solve the DV Paramonov. From the inclusion of the creative potential of people depends on it. If each person feels that he is "state" that his vote means a lot, both at the local and at the national level, it will be a completely different people, which will afford it.
On the second day of need and problem solving money treatment, which puts on the mailing list "Impulse" Comrade. Volobuyev. If the circulation of money and emissions are in the hands of the state (as in the USSR), it becomes such a powerful lever that can disappear when virtually every difference between any of the forms of ownership. And if the circulation of money and issuance of national currency in the hands of a private bank, but still dependent on the International Monetary Fund (as now in Russia), in this case do not guarantee the life of any state, or private enterprises.
very interesting and relevant material is a "new view of political economy" Udilova and even I know terry anti-Soviet from the group Putruhina of personalized property, given the premise that the world economy stopped growing due to human alienation from the means of production.
Any scientific and engineering discipline begins with definitions of terms and concepts. Why not take, at least on a temporary priority, terms and definitions, prepared Atsyukovsky, gradually refining and adding them? In short, I think that a project or a group of "currents" should be kind of expert advice that takes everything, absolutely everything socially significant problems. The discussions revealed stitch and useful ideas made her the completed and published in the media (website) "currents." Offered for public inspection "new socialist manifesto" (Project) is not worse than CDH.
AG Kozlobaev. Movement for the Soviet Union, Moscow, 5 December 2009.
0 comments:
Post a Comment