VS Stepanov
10/21/1909 Russia's population declines sharply. Demographers give this fact the name of "the Russian cross." Public opinion asks this question: Do we extinguish or annihilate us?. The analysis of the political and economic development gives a convincing answer: not openly kill us but we can disappear in favor of the "billions privileged humanity."
When September Minregión reported on the situation in many cities, some of which will disappear from the map of Russia, has been absolutely clear-in the country is that there is a surplus population and the power that is a headache. If anyone under any pretext will cause havoc to the same population poisoned with pesticides or any chemical substance would not have many problems. But while these problems exist and threaten to acts of social unrest and political insubordination.
The proposed Minregión divide many cities in critical and stable. To the first implement a statewide program of migration and the rest will be retained. There, where it is possible to extend the agony of the country's main industrial centers will prolong the hope that people will be smart and strong in themselves, but the remaining will die naturally. This means only one thing: the current power is ready to declare the licensing of the large population of Russian territory and is prepared to reduce the industry. This strategic thinking and this program does not set the population growth and development. Reduce industrial centers even if the critics is likewise also reduce trading posts.
remember: in 400 major cities built even in Soviet times around of the great industrial combination, is concentrated on 25% of the urban population of the country before the crisis created 40% of GDP (in a normal direction, this percentage should be significantly higher.) The industrial centers were founded as a rule, in regions where raw material resources. Now since there has been proposed to leave under the pretext of low profitability. Where can I take this damn low profitability and depression?. Is it explainable causes?. Yes, there!. In the last long 18 years of power, satisfying the interests of the oligarchy, he strove to build the economy of finance, despite forgetting a real sector of the economy and the people, who work in it. The economy of finance is convenient for those who believe "pyramid" schemes and capital reflux, is much safer to build factories and mills. The combined industrial
were privatized under the program proposed by Chubais, one of them was submitted after attacks-this was the second stage of division of property. The new owners felt the property obtained exclusively from the position of the funds, under which you can receive credit or funding from a budget. Such nonsense, such as collective bargaining, improved technological processes, quality and final product claims of no interest to these people. Without doubt, the credits received pursuant to the vital principles of parasites economists, not invested in production, but quickly went to foreign banks. The funds that time expired, collapsed infrastructure, specialists were (at the same time, some honestly could not resist looking at the looting of Russia, a different world out quickly.) People who have a minimum living were forced to economize on necessities, not fully allowed to rest for years, not receiving food and medical service quality. Young people have stopped producing, he has forgotten to dream and develop plans for the future. He has remained small accessible "joy" - alcohol and drugs. All this has been the reason as the scale is also a violent death and catastrophic population. "I would take the power
any conclusion from the above?. That probably would if it proposed an agenda for development, but not surrender the rest of the population in industrial cities ruined. The development of the industry in terms of demographic decline automatically creates a deficit of labor resources, raises concern about the person, persons receiving long-term plans for the future and a situation that they can live material, produce, build houses, buy clothes, furniture, cars, heal, rest and conveniently form a market demand for the economy is a growth factor. Yikes! we see a completely different political vector. Instead of fighting against demographic decline, depression and industrial decay, the government, it seems, has decided to lead this process, called optimization of the economy. And I warn you, this is ideally includes the concept of "soft policy" issued by the ideologue principal of United Russia "Mr. Surkov. Proof of this course is about this: Russia has oil and gas pipelines that produce a steady income and fully serve the needs of the ruling elite. They are encouraged to direct a portion of the profits from oil and gas to develop other sectors of the economy and in conformity remove this part to those who long have their legal benefit. He wondered why it is necessary to Russia in general, an industrial complex, when you have gas and oil, but the population dies abruptly and rapidly approaching the optimum number of 50 million people?. Precisely this amount of population is necessary for the maintenance and defense should be the leaders of the "billions privileged humanity." (The Western leaders Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Maddeleine Albright recommended to the Russian leadership to reduce the number of the population to 15-20 million people, who could not find a proposal by the Russian partners).
today reflects the power and starts talking about the modernization of the economy on an innovative base. However, the question is: where to take and where to implement the innovations, if they are discovered?. The fact is that innovations can be planted in the economy as well as seeds in a patch, they can not themselves be separated from production. So discussions on innovations become the talk of the bureaucrats in a creation myth, for the dreamers of floppy ears. We do not have the mechanism of production of innovations, not like in China carried out day and night in factories, where they could be introduced, however, and economists have found afflicted who dare to say that for an innovative economy we have too much population barajaría and thinking of its reduction is not enough to cut jobs.
Do you understand the falsehood of misanthropic propaganda?
Do you understand the lie the wind?
When September Minregión reported on the situation in many cities, some of which will disappear from the map of Russia, has been absolutely clear-in the country is that there is a surplus population and the power that is a headache. If anyone under any pretext will cause havoc to the same population poisoned with pesticides or any chemical substance would not have many problems. But while these problems exist and threaten to acts of social unrest and political insubordination.
The proposed Minregión divide many cities in critical and stable. To the first implement a statewide program of migration and the rest will be retained. There, where it is possible to extend the agony of the country's main industrial centers will prolong the hope that people will be smart and strong in themselves, but the remaining will die naturally. This means only one thing: the current power is ready to declare the licensing of the large population of Russian territory and is prepared to reduce the industry. This strategic thinking and this program does not set the population growth and development. Reduce industrial centers even if the critics is likewise also reduce trading posts.
remember: in 400 major cities built even in Soviet times around of the great industrial combination, is concentrated on 25% of the urban population of the country before the crisis created 40% of GDP (in a normal direction, this percentage should be significantly higher.) The industrial centers were founded as a rule, in regions where raw material resources. Now since there has been proposed to leave under the pretext of low profitability. Where can I take this damn low profitability and depression?. Is it explainable causes?. Yes, there!. In the last long 18 years of power, satisfying the interests of the oligarchy, he strove to build the economy of finance, despite forgetting a real sector of the economy and the people, who work in it. The economy of finance is convenient for those who believe "pyramid" schemes and capital reflux, is much safer to build factories and mills. The combined industrial
were privatized under the program proposed by Chubais, one of them was submitted after attacks-this was the second stage of division of property. The new owners felt the property obtained exclusively from the position of the funds, under which you can receive credit or funding from a budget. Such nonsense, such as collective bargaining, improved technological processes, quality and final product claims of no interest to these people. Without doubt, the credits received pursuant to the vital principles of parasites economists, not invested in production, but quickly went to foreign banks. The funds that time expired, collapsed infrastructure, specialists were (at the same time, some honestly could not resist looking at the looting of Russia, a different world out quickly.) People who have a minimum living were forced to economize on necessities, not fully allowed to rest for years, not receiving food and medical service quality. Young people have stopped producing, he has forgotten to dream and develop plans for the future. He has remained small accessible "joy" - alcohol and drugs. All this has been the reason as the scale is also a violent death and catastrophic population. "I would take the power
any conclusion from the above?. That probably would if it proposed an agenda for development, but not surrender the rest of the population in industrial cities ruined. The development of the industry in terms of demographic decline automatically creates a deficit of labor resources, raises concern about the person, persons receiving long-term plans for the future and a situation that they can live material, produce, build houses, buy clothes, furniture, cars, heal, rest and conveniently form a market demand for the economy is a growth factor. Yikes! we see a completely different political vector. Instead of fighting against demographic decline, depression and industrial decay, the government, it seems, has decided to lead this process, called optimization of the economy. And I warn you, this is ideally includes the concept of "soft policy" issued by the ideologue principal of United Russia "Mr. Surkov. Proof of this course is about this: Russia has oil and gas pipelines that produce a steady income and fully serve the needs of the ruling elite. They are encouraged to direct a portion of the profits from oil and gas to develop other sectors of the economy and in conformity remove this part to those who long have their legal benefit. He wondered why it is necessary to Russia in general, an industrial complex, when you have gas and oil, but the population dies abruptly and rapidly approaching the optimum number of 50 million people?. Precisely this amount of population is necessary for the maintenance and defense should be the leaders of the "billions privileged humanity." (The Western leaders Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Maddeleine Albright recommended to the Russian leadership to reduce the number of the population to 15-20 million people, who could not find a proposal by the Russian partners).
today reflects the power and starts talking about the modernization of the economy on an innovative base. However, the question is: where to take and where to implement the innovations, if they are discovered?. The fact is that innovations can be planted in the economy as well as seeds in a patch, they can not themselves be separated from production. So discussions on innovations become the talk of the bureaucrats in a creation myth, for the dreamers of floppy ears. We do not have the mechanism of production of innovations, not like in China carried out day and night in factories, where they could be introduced, however, and economists have found afflicted who dare to say that for an innovative economy we have too much population barajaría and thinking of its reduction is not enough to cut jobs.
Do you understand the falsehood of misanthropic propaganda?
Do you understand the lie the wind?
Translated by: Irina Malenko
0 comments:
Post a Comment